Transcription
201
12
SOCIAL STATEMENTS
THE LUTHERAN CHURCH INTAMERICA
Sex, Marriage, and Family
Adopted by the Fifth Biennial Convention
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Sex, marriage, and family are gifts of God in which to rejoice. Their
essential goodness cannot be obscured by any crisis of our time.
As traditional moral codes are being challenged, there is a profound
struggle to formulate bases of ethical judgment which have meaning for
contemporary man. Powerful forces of social change, joined with
discoveries in the medical and life sciences, influence all aspects of human
existence. The church is concerned not only with specific issues and con-
troversies, but with the basic Christian understanding of man's sexuality.
HUMAN SEXUALITY
Who is man? Man is a responsible person made in the image of God.
God created male and female, making sexual interdependence serve the.
divine intention for life-in-community. Scripture portrays man as a rela-
tional being whose true humanity is realized in faith and love with God and
neighbor.
True humanity is violated by sin, which is man's broken relationship
with God and fellowman. This alienation expresses itself in all facets of life,
including sex, marriage, and family. At the same time God works in these
broken relationships, healing and freeing the forgiven to devote their ef
forts to the well-being of others.
Human sexuality is a gift of God for the expression of love and the
generation of life. As with every good gift, it is subject to abuses which
cause suffering and debasement. In the expression of man's sexuality, it is
the integrity of his relationships which determines the meaning of his ac-
tions. Man does not merely have sexual relations; he demonstrates his true
humanity in personal relationships, the most intimate of which are sexual.
MARRIAGE
Christian faith affirms marriage as a covenant of fidelity - a dynamic,
lifelong commitment of one man and one woman in a personal and sexual
union. While hereafter in this report the phrase "covenant of fidelity" is.
employed, and we recognize it as expressing a key insight about Christian
marriage, in biblical language, it may also be helpful at times to express
the same emphasis in other terminology through such a phrase as "mutual
commitment to lifelong faithfulness" as a substitute for a "covenant of
fidelity." Marriage is not simply a legal transaction which can be broken
1
---
في
1
83
االله
ی بانوان ایران
when the conditions under which it was entered no longer exist. It is an un-
conditional relationship, a total commitment based on faithful trust. This
union embodies God's loving purpose to create and enrich life. As the
"needs of the partners change, the covenant of fidelity must be renewed by
God's grace and continually reaffirmed by husband and wife.
This view transcends the civil understanding of marriage as a legal con-
tract. A marital union can be legally valid yet not be a covenant of fidelity,
just as it can be a covenant of fidelity and not a legal contract. Such a
covenant is also to be distinguished from an identification with the mar-
riage pattern of any particular culture, from the idea that an established
structure is normative for all times, and from the legalistic notion that
because two people have had sexual intercourse they are bound together
forever. The existence of a true covenant of fidelity outside marriage as a
legal contract is extremely hard to identify.
Marriage is ordained by God as a structure of the created order. Thus
the sanction of civil law and public recognition are important and
beneficial in marriage, as checks against social injustice and personal sin.
The marriage covenant, therefore, should be certified by a legal contract,
and Christian participants should seek the blessings of the church.
The relationship between husband and wife is likened in Ephesians 5:21-
23 to the relationship between Christ and the church. This depicts a com-
munion of total persons, each of them living for the other. As with the
covenant between Christ and the church, the promise of fidelity is fun-
damental. Therefore, Christians regard marriage as a primary setting in
which to live out their calling from the Lord.
However, many persons are single for varied reasons. There should be
no exaltation of either the single or the married state, one over the other. It
is a matter for gratitude when the conditions of life make possible free and
open choices.
FAMILY
The family has the function of nurturing human beings in relationships
which are rich with creative possibilities. It provides the surrounding in
which persons enhance rather than exploit one another, in which mistakes
may be made and forgiveness realized.
'
The family appears in many forms in different times and. places.. It.
develops in response to the need of men, women, and children; whether
married or unmarried, for a primary relationship in which they may have
a sense of intimacy and belonging. There is no greater challenge today than
in the family, for it is intended by God to be that basic community, in
which personhood is fostered. The family should not become centered on
itself, but should be seen as a base from which its members move out to
participate in society.
が
ETHICAL DECISION.
The Christian's ethical decisions are made in the context of his rela-
tionships with God and other persons. The Christian acts knowing that he
daily becomes alienated from God and daily needs God's forgiveness.
Under God's grace, however, he is freed to choose how best to serve his
fellowmen in Christian love.
心
زاد
---
Page 2
February 25, 1980
Senator Carl Thompson
inclusive of sexual behavior. This does not in any way condone sexual practices
that are in violation of the rights of others or are actions of violence.
However,
I am in strong support of legislation that protects the rights of individuals in
the area of sexual behavior.
Sincerely,
Thomas A Pannello
Thomas A. Rannells
Program Associate
Wisconsin Conference United Methodist Church
TAR: amr
CC Timothy Cullen
Michele Radosevich
Joseph Strohl
David Opitz
Dorothy Gosting
---
K
Time
The Christian needs more than love to guide him. In making decisions he
should recognize that he and the other persons with whom he acts are
unique men, women, and children with particular gifts and responsibilities,
living in particular places and relationships. Furthermore, he draws his
guidance and strength from the Christian revelation, bringing to each
situation the benefits of the accumulated wisdom and supporting fellowship
of the church.
Human life must be regulated by just laws because man is finite and sin-
ful. Such laws, enacted by reason and enforced by power, can never be the
direct expression of Christian love. Nevertheless, Christians as citizens and
the church as institution should join with others in advocating and sup-
¨porting just laws. In this process, however, it is not proper for any church
to impose its sectarian views on the general community.
SOME CURRENT ISSUES
The following statements are not to be thought of as categorical laws or
"Christian" solutions to the problems involved. Nor are they intended to
furnish easy answers to hard questions. They are offered as guidance to
pastors and laymen in their ethical decision-making.
1: Some Issues Related to Sexual Expression
Within the realm of human sexuality, intercourse is a joyful means of
giving oneself in the mutual expression of love. It is within the permanent
covenant of marital fidelity that the full potential of coitus to foster gen-
uine intimacy, personal growth, and the responsible conception of children
is realized.
Because the Lutheran Church in America holds that sexual intercourse
outside the context of the marriage union is morally wrong, nothing in this
statement on "Sex, Marriage, and Family" is to be interpreted as meaning
that this church either condones or approves premarital or extra-marital
sexual intercourse.
Scientific research has not been able to provide conclusive evidence
regarding the causes of homosexuality. Nevertheless, homosexuality is
viewed biblically as a departure from the heterosexual structure of God's
creation. Persons who engage in homosexual behavior are sinners only as
are all other persons - alienated from God and neighbor. However, they
are often the special and undeserving victims of prejudice and discrimina-
tion in law, law enforcement, cultural mores, and congregational life. In
relation to this area of concern, the sexual behavior of freely consenting
adults in private is not an appropriate subject for legislation or policè ac-
tion. It is essential to see such persons as entitled to understanding and
Justice in church and community.
7.
Sexual exploitation in any situation, either personally or commercially,
inside or outside legally contracted marriage, is sinful because it is destruc-
tive of God's good gift and man's integrity.
The church recognizes the effects of social environment and cultural.
traditions on human behavior. It seeks, therefore, to respond un-
derstandingly to persons who enter into relationships which do not
demonstrate a covenant of fidelity.
3%
ず
S
7
---
fr
2. Some Issues Related to Marriage
It is the quality of interpersonal relationships within marriage that is the
concern of the church. A covenant of fidelity can be broken in reality
whether the union terminates formally through legal action or displays ex-
ternal solidarity. In ministering to persons affected by a broken covenant
*the church is called to assist them to perceive their problems more clearly
and, hopefully, to experience forgiveness and reconciliation.
If the outcome is formal dissolution of the marriage, the church should
*continue to minister to all persons involved. To identify the legal action of
divorce as sinful by itself obscures the fact that the marital relationship has
already been mutually undermined by thoughts, words, and actions.
Although divorce often brings anguish to those concerned, there may be
situations in which securing a divorce is more responsible than staying
together.
x
·
When the question of the remarriage of a divorced man or woman
arises, the church and the individuals themselves will do well to concentrate
upon the potential of the new rather then the collapse of the former mar-
riage.
A clear understanding of the dynamics which led to the breakdown
of the first union helps a person prepare more adequately for the second. A
divorced man and woman, of course, should fulfill all legitimate obligations
to the members of the broken family.
A shared Christian faith contributes to the strength of a marriage. Even
more, marriage and family provide a primary setting for Christian nurture
and maturity. Before a man and woman enter into an interfaith marriage,
each should strive to understand and respect his own faith and the faith of
his partner. They should become intelligently informed about factors which
can cause special difficulty.
Theologically, marriage between persons without reference to racial and
ethnic differences and background is a witness to the oneness of man under
the one God, and as such should be fully accepted in both church and
society.
3. Some Issues Related to Conception Control
The ethical significance of the use of any medically approved con-
traceptive method within a covenant of marital fidelity depends upon the
* motivation of the users. A responsible decision for or against having a
child will include evaluation of such factors as the health of the potential
mother, a reliable prognosis concerning the health of a possible, child, the
number and spacing of other children, the family's economic
circumstances, and the rapid growth of population. People have a right not
to have children without being accused of selfishness or a betrayal of the
divine plan and every child has a right to be a wanted child.
*
All persons are entitled to receive from governmental and voluntary
agencies information about conception control.
4. Some Issues Related to Abortion
1.
名
In the consideration of induced abortion the key issue is the status of the
unborn fetus. Since the fetus is the organic beginning of human life, the
termination of its development is always a serious matter, Nevertheless, a
qualitative distinction must be made between its claims and the rights of a
responsible person made in God's image who is in living relationships with
4
#
W
---
God and other human beings. This understanding of responsible
personhood is congruent with the historical Lutheran teaching and practice
whereby only living persons are baptized..
On the basis of the evangelical ethic, a woman or couple may decide
responsibly to seek an abortion, Earnest consideration should be given to
the life and total health of the mother, her responsibilities to others in her
family, the stage of development of the fetus, the economic and
psychological stability of the home, the laws of the land, and the con-
sequences for society as a whole.
Persons considering abortion are encouraged to consult with their physi-
cians and spiritual counselors. This church upholds its pastors and other
responsible counselors, and persons who conscientiously make decisions
about abortion.
5. Some Issues Related to Family Life Education
ད
There is need for competent education to understand sexuality and to
prepare for courtship, marriage, and family.
This kind of education properly begins in the home, where parents teach
their children not only by words but by their actions and expression of
feeling. But children and young people also learn from other sources, such
as the peer group, books, movies and television, which often convey, in-
complete or distorted information. Parents have the right to expect help
from the church in their roles as educators in sex, marriage, and family,
particularly in relating their Christian convictions to this task.
The church supports responsible family life education in the public
school, so long as religious and moral commitments are respected. Helping
young people grow into mature men and women is so important that every
possible resource must be involved, including competent, voluntary agen-
cies. But it is the public school that can furnish an education reaching most
children and young people. Family life education in the school should in-
clude parents in its planning and execution. It should also offer courses for
them, coordinated with those their children are taking.
The task of education in sex, marriage, and family requires that the
home, the church, and the school prepare themselves for effective fulfill-
ment of their appropriate roles.
A CALL
The Lutheran Church in America calls upon its pastors to reinforce the
covenant of fidelity in their liturgical leadership, preaching, teaching, and
counseling. It calls upon its members to study this statement and the
booklet Sex, Marriage, and Family: a Contemporary Christian Perspec-
tive; and to give support to one another amid the painful ambiguities of
making ethical decisions relating to sex, marriage, and family. It calls upon
its agencies of education and social service to develop specific plans for
helping synods and congregations incorporate the major emphases of this
statement into their lives. It calls upon the church, both as a corporate
body and as individual members, to witness to the civic community in
behalf of just laws and policies affecting sex, marriage, and family, and in
behalf of legislation that will improve the economic and social conditions
which influence the lifestyles of people.
5
---
B
1
AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION
1155 EAST 60TH ST.. CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60637 TELEPHONE (312) 493-0533
December 21, 1973
Dr. Bruce Voeller'
National Gay Task Force
Suite 1903-1904
80 Fifth Avenue
New York, New York 10011
Dear Dr. Voeller:
Pursuant to our telephone conversation today,
the following is the resolution adopted by the
American Bar Association's House of Delegates at
its 1973 Annual Meeting held in Washington, D. C.
on August 6-8:
Resolved, That the legislatures of the
several states are urged to repeal all
laws which classify as criminal conduct
any form of non-commercial sexual conduct
between consenting adults in private,
saving only those portions which protect
minors or public decorum.
AVP: bdc
Sincerely yours
Alicia
Alicia V. Pond
Office of the Secretary
---
CIVIL SERVICL
news
FOR RELEASE:
R
U SERVICE COMMISSION
ADVANCE FOR THURSDAY AFTERNOON NEWSPAPERS, JULY 3,
NOT TO BE USED BY PRESS, RADIO, OR TV BEFORE
6:30 A.M., EDT, THURSDAY, JULY 3, 1975
The Civil Service Commission has issued new guidelines for evaluating
the suitability of individuals for Federal employment.
The guidelines amplify revised suitability standards, approved by the
Commission earlier following thorough consideration and consultation with
Federal agencies and interested organizations. Both the standards and the
guidelines fully reflect significant court decisions, the Government's
need to maintain efficiency of operations, and the rights of individuals.
The new guidelines are based on the concept that each case must be
decided on its own merits and that all decisions regarding the fitness of
applicants or employees should be made in a manner that will promote the
efficiency of the service while assuring fair, impartial, and equitable.
treatment of the individual.
――
A significant change from past policy resulting from court decisions
and injunction provides for applying the same standard in evaluating
sexual conduct, whether heterosexual or homosexual.
--
"Court decisions require that persons not be disqualified from Federal
employment solely on the basis of homosexual conduct," the guidelines point
out. "The Commission and agencies have been enjoined not to find a person
unsuitable for Federal employment solely because that person is a homosexual
or has engaged in homosexual acts. Based upon these court decisions and
outstanding injunction, while a person may not be found unsuitable based on
unsubstantiated conclusions concerning possible embarrassment to the Federal
service, a person may be dismissed or found unsuitable for Federal employment
where the evidence establishes that such person's sexual conduct affects
job fitness."
Decisions to deny employment to applicants or to separate employees
already on the rolls on suitability grounds may be taken only when it can
be shown that the conduct of the individual may reasonably be expected to
interfere with the ability of the person to function in the job or the
agency's ability to discharge its responsibilities. As the courts have
ordered, there must be some rational connection between the individual's
conduct and the efficiency of the service.
2
-2-
Under the policy and its attendant guidelines for evaluating the
suitability of individuals, the following factors may be considered as
bases for disqualification:
1. Delinquency or misconduct in prior employment.
2. Criminal, dishonest, infamous, or notoriously disgraceful conduct.
3. Intentional false statement, deception, or fraud in examination
or appointment.
4. Refusal to furnish testimony (answers) as required by civil servic
rules.
5. Habitual use of intoxicating beverages to excess.
6.
Abuse of narcotics, drugs, or other controlled substances.
7. Reasonable doubt as to the loyalty of the person involved to the
Government of the United States.
8. Any statutory disqualification which makes the person unfit for
Federal service.
In making suitability determinations, evaluators must consider each
of the following factors to the extent that any or all of the factors are
pertinent to the individual case under consideration:
a.
The kind of position the person is applying for or serving in,
including its sensitivity.
b. The nature and seriousness of the conduct.
c.
Circumstances surrounding the conduct.
d. Recency of the conduct.
e. Age of the person at the time of the conduct.
f. Contributing social or environmental conditions.
g. Absence or presence of rehabilitation or efforts toward
rehabilitation.
Grps. AO, OPA-3-4, OPA-6-15, AXD-1 & Grp. 26
---
THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
WISCONSIN AREA
JESSE R. DEWITT
Resident Bishop
325 Emerald Terrace
MARY E. RUSSELL
Administrative Secretary
Sun Prairie, Wisconsin 53590
Telephone: (608) 837-8526
January 25, 1980
The Honorable David Clarenbach
State Capitol
Madison, Wisconsin 53702
Dear Representative Clarenbach:
I am in receipt of your letter indicating the intro-
duction of the Sexual Privacy Bill for the State
Legislature, and I want to commend you for your
willingness to present such a proposal to the
Legislature this session.
As one individual, I am personally supportive of
this measure and want to affirm the intention of
the legislation.
The protection of human rights is a critical issue
in our time and I believe that out State should take
a forthright position in assuring the rights of every
individual, regardless of age, sex, race or economic
position. I believe that this will strengthen and
assure the rights of every individual and place us
in a firm position for future years.
Thanks for your inquiry and leadership.
Sincerely yours,
Jesse R. & Wett
Jesse R. Dewitt
JRD/mr
---
THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH
WISCONSIN AREA
January 8, 1980
JESSE R. DeWITT
Resident Bishop
325 Emerald Terrace
MARY E RUSSELL
Administrative Secretary
Sun Prairie, Wisconsin 53590
Telephone: (608) 837-8526
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
The position of the United Methodist Church, as expressed in the
Social Principles adopted by the General Conference in 1976, states
that
We recognize that sexuality is a good gift of God, and we
believe persons may be fully human only when that gift is
acknowledged and affirmed by themselves, the Church and
society. We call all persons to disciplines that lead to
the fulfillment of themselves, others, and society in the
stewardship of this gift. Medical, theological, and human-
istic disciplines should combine in a determined effort to
understand human sexuality more completely.
Although men and women are sexual beings whether or not
they are married, sex between a man and a woman is only
to be clearly affirmed in the marriage bond.
Sex may
become exploitative within as well as outside marriage.
We reject all sexual expressions which damage or destroy
the humanity God has given us as birthright, and we affirm
only that sexual expression which enhances that same human-
ity, in the midst of diverse opinion as to what constitutes
that enhancement. Homosexuals no less than hetrosexuals
are persons of sacred worth, who need the ministry and
guidance of the Church in their struggles for human fulfill-
ment, as well as the spiritual and emotional care of a
fellowship which enables reconciling relationships with
God, with others, and with self. Further we insist that
all persons are entitled to have their human and civil rights
ensured, though we do not condone the practice of homosexual-
ity and consider this practice incompatible with Christian
teaching.
I support this decision and position and personally affirm that we
must protect the right of every individual and that their civil rights
must be upheld. This means the right of due process, civil rights,
legal and police protection and job security and employment guarantees.
Discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation would deny such rights.
This does not in any way condone sexual practices that are in violation
of the rights of others or that are actions of violence.
I trust that the legislature of Wisconsin will enact appropriate legis-
lation and assure due process and protection under the law for all of
its citizens.
---
COUNCIL ON MINISTRIES
February 25, 1980
wisconsin conference
325 EMERALD TERRACE. SUN PRAIRIE, WI
608-837-7328
53590
Senator Carl Thompson
Wisconsin State Senate, 31-S
State Capitol
Madison, Wisconsin 53702
Dear Senator Thompson:
I would like to express my support for updating the current laws regarding sexual
morality as recommended in SB 552. More specifically, I support:
1)
2)
add the words "in public" to the sodomy and fornication statutes, ..
making these acts criminal only when performed in public;
repeal the cohabitation statute, thereby decriminalizing the
behavior of those who "openly cohabit in circumstances implying
sexual intercourse;"
3)
restore to those convicted under the sodomy statute the right to
obtain a driver's license.
It seems to me that such efforts to decriminalize sexual behavior that takes place
(1) in private, (2) between adults or married minors, and (3) is based on consent
allows us to be more protective of individual and civil rights.
The United Methodist Church challenges governments to provide and protect basic
freedoms. Our Social Principles state "We hold governments responsible for the
protection of the rights of the people to the freedoms of speech, religion, assembly,
and communications media; to the right to privacy; and to the guarantee of the rights
to adequate food, clothing, shelter, education, and health care. The use of de-
tention and imprisonment for the harassment and elimination of political opponents
or other dissidents violates fundamental human rights. Furthermore, the mistreat-
ment or torture of persons by governments for any purpose violates Christian teach-
ing and must be condemned and/or opposed by Christians and churches wherever and
whenever it occurs.
"
I trust that this hearing and legislature will make its decision in light of the
protective responsibility governments have regarding the private and civil rights
of its citizens. Such rights cover a broad range of human behavior which ought be
the united methodist church
JESSE R. DEWITT: RESIDENT BISHOP
DAVID W. CHEVALIER: CONFERENCE TREASURER
WAYNE D. HELMERICH: SERVICE DEPARTMENT DIRECTOR
DONALD A. OTT:
MARY H. COUNCIL:
IRIS L. HARVEY:
PROGRAM DIRECTOR
PROGRAM ASSOCIATE
PROGRAM ASSOCIATE
THOMAS A. RANNELLS: PROGRAM ASSOCIATE
---