Transcription
Profile: David Clarenbach
The
Power of
Principle
by Betty Brickson
ISTHMUS
Two years ago, former Green Bay
Packers coach Bart Starr appeared
before a state legislative committee to
request an exemption from
Wisconsin's gay rights law. Starr
represented the Rawhide Boys Ranch
near New London, a private residen-
tial treatment center for troubled
youth.
The ranch had always hired
married couples, where, as Starr put it,
"one spouse is a man and one is a
woman," to serve as parental role
models for the boys. In order to insure
that this practice would continue, Starr
asked that Rawhide be excluded from
the law.
Rep. David Clarenbach (D-
Madison), who as a child dreamed of
playing for the Packers, had fought
hard for passage of the antidiscrimina-
tion law, the only one of its kind in the
United States. He spoke in opposition
to his boyhood idol.
Holding aloft a green and gold
Packer helmet, Clarenbach noted that
the headgear was "essential protection
for every player in today's game of
football." In a similar way, he said,
Wisconsin's gay rights law protects
some of society's "most vulnerable."
It was a curious incident, one in
which the values of Packerland came
in direct conflict with those of
Madtown, but Clarenbach handled it
well, with humor, sensitivity and
aplomb. Once again, the representative
from Madison had demonstrated his
ability to find common ground - even
a football helmet - between opposing
views.
Most of his colleagues would
agree that Clarenbach has come a long
way. Dismissed as being too young,
too naive and too leftist during his
early days in office, Clarenbach has
since achieved the confidence that ac-
companies success.
Now approaching his eighth term
in office, Clarenbach is, at 34, a
seasoned veteran of state government
- one who is liked and respected by
his fellow lawmakers and who enjoys
strong support from his constituency
for his progressive legislation. His
legislative successes the passage of
the gay rights and sexual privacy bills
and, more recently, the Yahara Water-
shed compromise - have all but
swept away the criticisms of ineffec-
tiveness that plagued him earlier in his
career.
-
Clarenbach's struggle for
acceptance among his peers has been
long and arduous. Joining the
Assembly in 1974 at the tender age of
21, he was the long-haired boy
wonder, a vocal Soglin-era liberal
whose politics emerged from the civil
rights and antiwar movements of the
1960s. In his first term in office,
Clarenbach asked his older and
Vol. 13, No. 8, February 19-25, 1988
decidedly more conservative col-
leagues to decriminalize marijuana,
urge Congress to grant unconditional
amnesty to Vietnam War draft evaders
and pass a bill requiring companies to
give advance notification of plant
closings.
Recalls Rep. Joseph Tregoning (R-
Shullsburg), now assistant minority
leader: "He came in as a liberal flake,
and an immature one."
Things have indeed changed.
Although Clarenbach's agenda
remains ambitiously progressive, his
name now draws praise from both
sides of the political fence.
"Dave has matured tremendously
during his legislative career," says
state Sen. Fred Risser (D-Madison).
"He's learned the process of working
with his colleagues. It's one thing to
espouse concepts and ideas and phi-
losophies, but it's another thing to get
these measures passed. He's devel-
oped the technique of compromise."
Risser's comments are echoed by
former Dane County Executive
Jonathan Barry, who has publicly
sparred with Clarenbach over a
number of issues. "I have a high
opinion of him," says Barry. "Sure,
we've had our differences. But I've
watched David grow from being kind
of an ideologue in his early days to
reaching a good balance. He's becom-
ing more mature and more effective.
---
"He's a very principled guy,"
Barry continues. "You don't have to
agree with his politics completely to
respect him."
"He's a very fair person,' adds
Assembly Minority Leader Betty Jo
Nelsen (R-Shorewood). "It seems that
regardless of where the issue comes
from one can appeal to David's senses
of fairness, whether it's a rural issue or
an urban issue or a people issue."
Sitting in his small fourth floor
office recently, just down the hall from
the Civil War Museum and tucked
away from most of the hustle and
bustle of the Capitol, Clarenbach is the
picture of confidence. His walls are
covered with framed accolades from
such groups as Wisconsin's Environ-
mental Decade, the Wisconsin Civil
Liberties Union and the Wisconsin
Women's Political Caucus. There are
photos of Clarenbach with consumer
rights advocate Ralph Nadar, former
California Gov. Jerry Brown, "Star
Trek's" Leonard Nimoy and comedian
Steve Martin. And there's a Christmas
card from Jane Fonda and husband
Tom Hayden that reads, "For David
with respect."
TWO CONSTITUENCIES
Leaning back in his old swivel
chair, Clarenbach reflects on the days
when those same walls were bare.
"My very earliest years in public
office tended to be extremely frustrat-
ing," he says. "I was fighting the
losing battles, whether it was on issues
like sexual privacy or the nuclear
moratorium or some of the tax
reforms. The issues I chose to
prioritize put me a bit on the outside
of the club. It was tempting at times to
quit."
What made things easier, he says,
was learning how to reconcile his
defeats. "Logic-shmogic- that's not
what necessarily carries the day in any
legislative process. I think I learned
that lesson very quickly and devel-
oped a set of standards and internal
mechanisms to judge myself and to
become satisfied with my work.
"It's not necessarily the battles
you win or even the commendations
you receive. You have to feel good
about yourself."
To judge from the wide voter
margins by which he's been re-elected,
Clarenbach has done a good job repre-
senting the interests of his constitu-
ency. His 78th District, which includes
east Madison, Maple Bluff and the
isthmus, is unlike any other in the
state. Voters are heavily Democratic
and politically active, and they have a
definite lean toward the left. District
reapportionment in 1982 eliminated
much of his student constituency, but
the core of Clarenbach's support lies in
tidy east-side homes where former
'60's activists are now raising families.
Clarenbach recognizes the
freedom afforded by this kind of
support, and the responsibility.
"People like myself, who have the
benefit of a constituency that is
sympathetic to a set of principles, have
an obligation to use that forum to be
aggressive and assertive and outspo-
ken," he says.
A nagging problem for Claren-
bach has been translating the social
reform issues inspired by his constitu-
ents into legislation that can be
accepted by the rest of the Assembly.
"One thing that I did not recognize in
my first few years in the Assembly
was that to be really good in the
legislature, you had to be accepted by
two constituencies; the first constitu-
ency that elects you and the second
that votes on your bill." he says.
"Unless you can be accepted by both
constituencies, in that order, you can't
get to first base."
Part of being accepted by that
second constituency, Clarenbach has
learned is recognizing that his 98
colleagues in the Assembly have
different, equally valid priorities. But
that has not kept him from pursuing
his own priorities with uncommon
vigor.
Fellow Democrat David Travis,
who represents northwestern Dane
County, says of Clarenbach, "one of
the things he's been able to do in the
legislature is take an issue that might
not start out with a large statewide
constituency over a broad spectrum,
and get that bill signed into law."
IMPOSSIBLE DREAMS
Two of Clarenbach's successes -
the gay rights bill and a sexual privacy
bill legalizing private, noncommercial
sex acts between consenting adults -
involved issues that were difficult to
"sell" politically in some parts of the
state.
"It wasn't a matter of convincing
the members of the legislature what
was right or wrong," says Clarenbach.
"The tough part was to create the
political environment where they felt
sufficiently secure to cast those votes.
So how do you do it? You put
yourself in the shoes of that average
legislator from Oshkosh or Superior
and see what political pressures are on
them that will allow or not allow them
to vote for a bill like that.
"You've got to figure the partisan
issue and the religious issue. If you
can create sufficient support within
those two communities of influence,
then the [legislators] can vote for sex
law reform."
Clarenbach successfully laid the
groundwork for the bills' passage by
gaining support from various religious
leaders and influential Republicans
across the state, including Gov. Lee
Dreyfus. "It illustrates how you can be
both honest to yourself and your prin-
ciples, and be sensitive to the needs of
your colleagues," he says.
It also illustrates cunning,
patience and tenacity-qualities that
did not go unnoticed. "There were
members of the legislature, perhaps
all, who thought a bill like that could
never be passed, and later voted for it,
at one point or another probably
reflected on that accomplishment. And
that reflection improved my standing
in the legislature."
Indeed, Clarenbach notes that the
antidiscrimination law was passed in
1982 and he was elected speaker pro
tempore of the Assembly in 1983. "I
don't think it was any mere coinci-
dence," he says.
GROWING UP
Much has been written of
Clarenbach's youthful entrance into
politics, of the high school student
who fought to secure student repre-
sentation on the Madison school board
and then turned that experience to a
successful run for the Dane County
Board. But looking even farther back,
in elementary school, a political mind
was forming.
On the night of the 1960 presiden-
tial election, Clarenbach, then a
second-grader growing up on
Madison's west side, went to bed
sobbing. The 7-year-old Kennedy
supporter had been told to go to bed
before the final results were tallied.
Nixon was ahead.
"I wouldn't let him stay up any
later," recalls his mother, Kathryn
Clarenbach, now a UW-Extension
professor of governmental affairs. "He
woke up, of course, knowing that
Kennedy had been elected.
'Unbeknownst to me, he realized
his teacher, who was a Nixon sup-
porter, must be feeling the way he felt
the night before. So at school he went
up to her and hugged her a little and
gave her a nickle. That was his idea of
comfort."
When he was 11, Clarenbach
participated in his first peace rally. He
remembers carrying a sign and
marching around one of the circular
flowerbeds at one corner of the
Capitol. It was the same year, 1964,
that he worked on John Reynold's
campaign for governor.
Unusual for a youngster, per-
haps. But not so unusual for a child
whose mother was the first chair-
woman of the National Organization
for Women (NOW). Not so odd for the
son of Henry Clarenbach, a Madison
realtor who was a McCarthy delegate
to the 1968 Democratic convention and
local organizer for the antiwar
movement. And not surprising for the
David with his mother, Kathryn, UW-Madison professor and first chairperson of
the National Organizaton for Women (NOW).
grandson of A.E. Frederick, a
Methodist minister who was elected to
the Assembly in 1914.
Clarenbach has two sisters; his
father, Henry, died in June 1987. "Both
of my parents had a profound
influence primarily because it was a
feminist household," he says. "My
parents shared family responsibilities
and income responsibilities as well."
When he was a junior in high
school, David worked briefly in
Mississippi on a black cooperative
farm. His host there was Fanny Lou
Hamer, a prominent civil rights
activist who led the 1964 black delega-
tion to the Democratic national
convention.
"It had a tremendous impact...
and it inspired a commitment,"
Clarenbach recalls. "People who refer
to burn-out amaze me. When you look
at the crucial social movements and
reform movements in history, the
people who have dedicated them-
selves to those movements don't do it
for a year or two until they find a
better job offer. They dedicate their
life."
Another influence was the late
Harvey Goldberg, the popular and
frenetic UW history professor with a
Marxist bent, who Clarenbach met just
as his political career began. "Harvey's
suspicions of the political process were
a useful counterbalance to my enthusi-
asm," reflects Clarenbach.
In Goldberg's view of history,
most social movements take place
outside of government, and the
legislative process should be seen as a
vehicle for social change not as an end
unto itself. "I think I have tried to
apply that," says Clarenbach. "I think
Harvey would be proud, but I suspect
in some ways he would continue to be
suspicious and a little cynical, and
probably rightly so."
ECONOMIC RIGHTS
Throughout his 14 years in state
government, Clarenbach has carried
the flag on a range of human rights
issues. But lately he's turned his
attention to the economy of the state,
promoting a concept that Franklin
Roosevelt referred to in his last
address to Congress in.1944 called
"economic democracy."
Clarenbach says the Democratic
Party has been lax in presenting a
progressive alternative to the eco-
nomic programs of the Reagan and
Thompson administrations, which he
says cater to the interests of industry
and disregard the fundamental human
rights of social and economic security.
He has called on his party to come up
---
The Gay Rights Bills
ONE OF THE heartening as-
pects of the sexual revolution
has been a growing awarness
that our laws dealing with
homosexuality are sadly out of
tune.
All over the country, state
legislatures are eliminating
medieval laws
that
discriminate against gay
women and men. Illinois has
just knocked down several
such statutes that have been
employed to discriminate
against gays.
The Wisconsin legislature
has several proposals to ex-
pand the "rights and legi-
timacy of gay people" in Wis-
consin, according to State Rep.
David E. Clarenbach (D-
Madison).
The so-called gay rights bills
and amendments to existing
law deserve serious considera-
tion. Knowing the tenor of the
times, we are not at all san-
guine about the success of the
proposals.
Why should a homosexual
suffer discrimination in hous-
ing? Why should homosexuals
be denied public accommoda-
tions? Licenses? Jobs?
There are many serious
questions about society's out-
moded attitude toward gays.
SENATE BILL 498 removes
"sexual preference" a barrier
to licensure and public
employment, for example.
It is about time Wisconsin
lived up to its reputation as a
progressive state. We know the
chances of change are slim. We
haven't even removed all of the
medieval strictures in our laws
against heterosexual relations.
We've yet to permit the sale
of contraceptives to unmarried
people. We're the last state in
the union to cling to that
ridiculous statute.
C-T 3/2/76
---
Gays: Fear of the unknown still prevails
By RON MCCREA
and
JO ANN ALLEN
Of The Capital Times Staff
ANITA BRYANT danced a little jig,
like Hitler at Paris, when she learned
how badly she had defeated us. This
curious performance was only one act
of the grotesque vaudeville that
played to capacity crowds in Miami.
Bryant also imitated Isaiah, warn-
ing Californians that their drought
was God's plague upon them for
adopting liberal nondiscrimination
laws. And she came on stage as Dr.
Frankenstein, theorizing that gays
must "reproduce" by "recruiting" in-
nocents, much in the way that vam-
pires legendarily increased the ranks
of the un-dead.
That the audience did not throw to-
matoes but, rather, gave her resound-
ing applause simply proves once again
Thoreau's dictum that, even though
the witches have been burned and
candles have been invented, people
are still a little afraid of the unknown.
FOR GAY people, the unknown has
included ourselves. For years there
has been a great psychic division be-
tween the ordinary, romantic feelings
that gay people actually have and the
nearly insane, pathological, twisted
life they are told they are supposed to
be leading as "homosexuals."
Until recently, gay people had to
face the overwhelming task of self-in-
tegration alone in a society only inter-
ested in condemning or converting
them.
The results were mixed. The strong-
est of the gays became superb sur-
vivors with a great tolerance for con-
tradiction in their lives. The less
strong were overtaken by chaos and
threw themselves on psychiatry or re-
ligion for salvation - if they did not go
the full route and commit an obliga-
tory suicide. Still others assumed
scarves and rouge (the gay male
equivalent of sackcloth and ashes) and
lived another permitted life - that of
Harlequin.
The gay movement, by shattering
the nearly total control that straight
society wielded over the image of the
homosexual, has created new possi-
bilities for gay people.
THIS WEEK is Gay Pride Week. It
is an observance given no general le-
gitimacy and ignored except in the
few cities where this is impossible.
This year it commemorates the eighth
anniversary of the Stonewall Riot, the
pitched battle that took place in
Greenwich Village between police and
gays who refused to be busted in a bar.
Since 1969, the week has simply be-
come an occasion for gay men and
women to be visible-visible in dis-
cussions and forums, marches and
parades. It has become an occasion,
as Anita Bryant might say, to "flaunt"
ourselves.
As uncomfortable as it might be in
the short run, this flaunting - of our
vitality, of our exuberance, of our or-
dinariness - is a genuine rite of exor-
cism for everyone. Laws protecting
civil rights can help gay people live in
private confidence, but only open dia-
logue can purge homosexuality of its
sinister mystique. The ultimate goal is
not to create a society of public
"homosexuals" and "heterosexuals"
but to destroy sexual ghettos and cre-
ate a society in which any love can
have a chance.
"Homophobia,"
our
peculiarly
Western queer-fear, is still wide-
spread. In the wake of the Miami vote,
a Johns Hopkins clinician warned that
public debate of homosexuality might
be harmful because "many people, es-
pecially males, are afraid consciously
or unconsciously that they may be ho-
mosexual" and discussion could "cre-
ate unnecessary anxiety" in their
minds and possibly trigger "hyper-
masculine behavior, emotional dis-
turbances, or abusive attitudes toward
homosexuals."
-
This admonition - that it is safer to
leave people with their fears than to
battle ignorance is the sort of non-
sense that gay people should certainly
ignore in this and future Gay Pride
Weeks. The best security we can
achieve is to convince just such people
that the gayness they feel and fear is
not a malady nor a disability and de-
cidedly not a tragedy - but rather a
capacity and, therefore, an opportu-
nity.
HOMOSEXUALITY
15
SACRILEGE
GAYS
VIOLATE
GOD'S LAW
IT'S
UNGODLY
CRUSH
THE
FRUITS
C-T 6/18/77
Ron McCrea
Jo Ann Allen
MIAMI
W
LET HIM WHO
IS WITHOUT
SIN CAST THE
FIRST STONE...
AUTH
THE
PHILADELPHIA INMAR
THE WASHINGTON POST NEM
---
GAY RIGHTS BILL
PASSES!
The Hou
3 Dec 1982
P.2
NEW SOUTH WALES
DOES A FIRST
On Friday November 26 the NSW Leg-
islative Council passed the Anti-Discrim-
ination (Amendment) Bill. The Bill inclu-
des the outlawing of discrimination on
the ground of homosexuality in certain
circumstances.
An Opposition attempt to delete the
homosexuality provisions of the Bill was
defeated by the Labor Party in the lower
house on November 25, by 62-24. The
Legislative Assembly had debated the Bill
for 2½ hours on Wednesday November
24. Speaking in favour were Neville Wran
(Labor/Premier), Fred Miller (Labor/
Bligh) and Rod Cavalier (Labor/Glades-
ville). Against were Tim Moore (Liberal/
Gordon), Leon Punch (National/Glou-
cester), Gerald Peacocke (National/
Dubbo) and James Cameron (Liberal/
Northcott).
In the Legislative Council Fred Nile
alone took 1 hour 10 minutes speaking
against the Bill. Others opposing the
homosexuality provisions were Virginia
Chadwick and Nathanael Orr. (Liberal)
and Robert Smith (National). Speaking in
favour were Paul Landa, Marie Fisher and
Franca Arena (Labor) and Elisabeth
Kirkby (Democrat). The Council passed
the Bill with one minor amendment. The
voting on the homosexuality provisions
of the Bill was notable for two Liberals,
John Holt and Derek Freeman, leaving
the chamber so they would not have to
vote with their party; the provisions were
carried 22-16.
The Baptist Union of NSW opposed
the Bill and in a letter to Wran dated
November 24, warned: "if the Govern-
ment persists in this evil legislation, it is
our intention to strongly encourage every
Baptist in NSW to vote against your
Gov-
ernment at the next election". Likewise
the Festival of Light threatened to work
against the ALP at the next state elec-
tion.
The Bill will become law when signed
by the Governor and gazetted. With the
new provisions the anti-discrimination
laws in NSW will be among the best in the
world. Hopefully this pioneering legisla-
tion in NSW will be followed by the other
states and territories.
---
Gay rights
"You have a governor and legisla-
ture willing to take political risks to
support gay rights", said David
Clarenbach of Gov. Tony Earl recent-
ly.
A recent Newsweek claims that
Wisconsin's advances in gay rights
(we are the only state to have
enacted a gay-rights law) are an en-
couraging sign for gay liberation else-
where.
Now The State Journal is sending
reporters to cover Madison's Gay
Theater Projects productions.
There are still people in this com-
munity who firmly believe in the old-
fashioned biblical principles of moral-
ity and intend to speak out and say so.
We take the position that a "gay"
is a male or female who has made a
biologically contrary choice of sexual
partner. This choice has made him or
her vulnerable to disease and at
times, a carrier of disease and infec-
tion. Mr. and Mrs. Frank Sowl,
Monona
Repeal sex law
When Gov. Earl signed a bill into
law legalizing fornication, co-habita-
tion and homosexual acts, didn't he
know that the Holy Bible forbids
these things?
Wisconsin citizens, write to Gov.
Earl and ask him to sponsor repeal of
that law. Mrs. Lolita Wenger, Mon-
roe
---
March 5, 1982- THE WASHINGTON BLADE - A-3
Governor signs Wisconsin rights bill
by Brad Green
Wisconsin Governor Lee Dreyfus on
February 25 signed the nation's first
statewide Gay rights bill into law. The
measure came to his desk from the
Senate where it was approved by a voice
vote on February 16.
Bill Kraus, an assistant to Dreyfus,
said that in the several days before the
bill was signed 2,500 to 3,000 calls were
received by the governor's staff either in
protest or support of the measure. "Nine
hundred calls to this place is a catas-
trophe," he exclaimed. "This was an all
time new record."
The pandemonium was touched off by
two conservative religious radio stations,
one in Milwaukee and the other in Madi-
son, when they convinced about 300 peo-
ple to call Dreyfus' office urging him to
veto the bill. This prompted mainline
churches and another Madison radio sta-
tion to urge people to phone in support
of the measure. At that point, said
Kraus, "the calls hit about 50-50 and
stayed there."
The bill amends the state's existing
civil rights law by adding sexual orienta-
tion to the list of protected categories.
The new protections include housing,
public accommodations, and employ-
ment, and also extend to the administra-
tive rules of state agencies, the National
Guard, and all firms under contract with
the state.
Kraus said that Dreyfus signed the bill
out of a conviction that people didn't
have the right to inquire into another's
sexual orientation. "He thinks that's an
outrageous invasion of privacy," declared
Kraus.
Dan Curd, legislative assistant to Rep.
David Clarenbach, who was the law's
chief sponsor, credits the bill's passage in
part to the fact "the opposition wasn't
that organized."
In addition, he said, the measure
enjoyed the support of many mainline
religious denominations including, sig-
nificantly, the Milwaukee archdiocese of
the Roman Catholic Church. It was that
diocese that had helped defeat an earlier
measure to legalize sexual relationships
between consenting adults. "There are
five Catholics in the assembly who voted
for this bill who did not vote for the con-
senting adults bill," noted Curd.
---
Wednesday, February 16, 1983 -the daily cardinal-page 4
FBI, military not employers
UW sexual orientation policy not effective
By Linda Kaplan
of the Cardinal Staff
The FBI and the U.S. military
fuse to hire "open" lesbians and
gay men at the University and
across the nation. Although a
"1982 state law and a 1979 Faculty
Senate Resolution prohibit dis-
crimination on the basis of sexual
orientation, both federal agencies
continue to recruit on campus.
A faculty Senate resolution
adopted on May 7, 1979, states
that "all policies on non-discrim-
ination in effect at UW-Madison
should include sexual orientation
as one of the bases on which dis-
crimination should be prohibit-
ed."
WISCONSIN'S FAIR Em-
ployment law was recently amend-
ed, now prohibiting sexual orien-
tation as a basis for employment
decisions. Last October Chancel-
lor Irving Shain, speaking at a Fa-
culty Senate meeting, outlined his
policies on the controversial re-
cruiting process. "The law was
written in such a way that it does
not apply to everyone who does
business in Wisconsin, but only to
persons or organizations the law
defines as 'employers"", Shain as-
serted.
"The federal government is not
defined as an employer under this
law. The question of supremacy of
state or federal regulations does
not even arise." He continued by
saying that there is "nothing in
Wisconsin law to bar a federal
agency from giving whatever at-
tention it wishes to sexual orien-
tation in making employment de-
cisions."
At the time of Shain's an-
nouncement, he invited faculty to
form a committee to study the re-
percussions of the ruling. Al-
though the committee was formed
four months ago, it has not yet
met. However, according to Ar-
thur Hove, assistant to the chan-
cellor, the committee has a report
due by March 15.
The committee also has student
members. Mark Borns, Student
Bar Association president and
committee member who has been
following the issue from the be-
ginning said, "The University is
bringing in an entity that dis-
criminates. We are aiding and
abetting that discrimination. Be-
cause no one person is being af-
fected, it looks like the only way to
change the University's position
is through a court order."
Borns said he believes the
"court route" may be a long haul.
Currently, state attorneys are
presently at work on the case. In
October Shain said, ""The Attor-
ney General's opinion may also
have some bearing on the use of
University recruitment facilities
by other federal agencies."
BORNS, A THIRD year law
student, said, "To me the law
seems clear. The dispute is over
the definition of 'employer.' Civil
rights are so basic that it shocks
me that it is even an issue. It's
reminiscent of the Southern
states (discriminating against
blacks). The University should be
in the forefront for protecting bas-
ic civil liberties."
But Edward Reisner of the Uni-
versity Law Placement Office
disagreed with Borns' interpreta-
tion. "I don't see it (the law) as
clear in any sense. You could take
any employer on campus and find
some discrimination. The ques-
tion boils down to two factors; Is
there proof that the FBI discrimi-
nates, and if they do, does the
state law prohibit the University
from providing services for them?"
asked Reisner. "In one sense it is a
moral issue. It is evidence of state
policy reflecting on a moral posi-
tion."
"
1
In reference to proving actual
evidence of discrimination, Shain from the school, but no student
said in October, "What sorts of al- has yet reached the national/fi-
legations or evidence would we nal hiring process.
consider sufficient to find an em-
ployer guilty? Who gathers that
evidence? A finding of discrimi-
nation by a court of law or other
appropriate government body
would give use a clear directive."
Reisner also said that in the
seven years that he has worked in
the Law Placement Office, "no
graduate (from the Law School)
has been hired" by the FBI. The
FBI seriously considers people
THE FBI WILL return to cam-
pus March 10, according to a Ca-
reer Advising and Placement
newsletter. Because of Shain's
ruling, they will be allowed to use
University facilities.
Attorney Michael Liethen, di-
rector of the University's Legal
Services, said there is "no legal
bar" against the FBI coming to
campus as well as recruiting and
using University property.
---
0194
ATTENTION
THE UNITED
306 North Brooks
Madison, Wisconsin 53715
ATTENTION
ATTENTION
(608) 255-8582
The United is planning on opening a second-hand store to help keep
The United working financially. What we need are your donations of
clothing, furniture, objects, and items that you do not need but are
resalable as second-hand. You know that the Moral Majority is fighting
strongly against us, and that we, ourselves, in Wisconsin do not have
our rights as being an individual. Please help us with our stuggle
by your support to the "Opened Closet" second-hand store.
drop your donations of things to the United at 306 North Brooks. Or
you may call us at 255-8582 and arrange a pick-up time.
Thank you,
Mental
Michael L. Thommen
You may
ATTENTION AGAIN
ATTENTION AGAIN
ATTENTION AGAIN
According to our records, you are no longer a current paid member of
The United. Yearly dues are $15/year or $1/$1000 low income." For
$25 you can join both The United and the National Gay Task Force (less
than the cost of joining NGTF for one year). We urge you to renew
your membership, so that you can still receive Gay Madison and receive
other membership benefits. With your membership, The United will still
be able to keep its struggle going against the anti-gay laws that the
State has, the Moral Majority, and all other homophobic people that The
United has worked with. For more information look at the last page of
Gay Madison. Hope to see you on the paid membership list.
Sincerely,
(Michael L. Thommen
University YMCA Community Center
---
Wisconsin State Journal, Wednesday, February 11, 1981
Anti-gay drive launched
SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - Calling
San Francisco the Sodom and Gomor-
rah of the nation, a coalition of funda-
mentalist groups says that it will
spend $3 million on a media campaign
attacking homosexuals.
The coalition said that it will at-
tempt to build anti-gay feeling in the
community and to persuade homosex-
uals to give up their lifestyle.
"I agree with capital punishment,
and I believe homosexuality is one of
those that could be coupled with mur-
der and other sins," said Dean Wycoff,
a spokesman for the Santa Clara
Moral Majority, one of the groups in-
volved in the campaign. Wycoff called
San Francisco, where homosexuals
are estimated at 15 percent of a popu-
lation of 675,000, "the Sodom and
Gomorrah of the United States and the
armpit of this perverted movement."
The Rev. Charles McIlhenny of
San Francisco's First Orthodox Pres-
byterian Church joined Wycoff in de-
nouncing homosexuality, saying, "Ac-
cording to the Scriptures, it is against
the law. We want to minister to homo-
sexuals and win them to Christ and
stop their sinning."
Homosexuals here have complained
in recent months of an increase in vio-
lence against them, including beatings
by people gay activists refer to as
"homophobics," and some expressed
concern that the crusade will heighten
tensions. "It certainly is a situation of
grave concern," said Richard
McQueen, editor of the gay newspaper
the Advocate. "It sounds like things
could get pretty ugly."
The Rev. Richard Zone, whose In
God We Trust Inc. group is spearhead-
ing the campaign, said that some
$3 million will be spent, beginning with
a mail and media blitz. "We're going to
march through this territory from one
end to the other," he said.
The group has announced no legis-
lative program to make homosexual
acts illegal or to repeal existing anti-
discrimination laws. But organizers
say they will watch lawmakers in Sac-
ramento for any legislation they feel
favors homosexuals.
In Lynchburg, Va., a spokesman for
Moral Majority Inc. denied knowledge
of the San Francisco movement but
said that the national organization, led
by evangalist Jerry Falwell, is against
protecting homosexuals as a minority
group. "We love homosexuals as per-
sons," vice president Cal Thomas said.
"What we resist is the attempt to in-
corporate their chosen lifestyle under
the heading of a minority group."
---
ng lion.
ad
lic
re
PE
C-
For Madison: A matter of human rights
(From the Milwaukee Journal)
THE DISTURBING thing about
those homosexual rights ordinances
now under attack around the nation is
that they were deemed necessary in
the first place.
The right of private sexual prefer-
ence among consenting adults should
be considered inherent. And as long as
someone does not impose this sexual
preference on others or cause commu-
nity harm, he or she should have the
basic human right to live withou. har-
assment or without discrimination
employment, housing and public uc-
commodations.
Yet local laws were deemed neces-
sary. And now three of them have
been repealed by voters in the past
year in Dade County, Fla.; St. Paul,
Minn. and Wichita, Kan. A similar
campaign is promised in Madison.
The backlash is an expression of
fears, honestly and widely held, that
homosexuals may try to convert the
young in our classrooms; molest other
citizens; disrupt the peace and stabil-
ity of neighborhood or office, or even
threaten the foundations of American
family life.
some respects, irrational. There are,
after all, laws and regulations and
rules that cover misconduct by all per-
sons, homosexual and otherwise -
sanctions that deal with molesters;
with teachers who preach sexual
views when they should simply teach;
with tenants who are noisy and disrup-
tive; with employees who let their pri-
vate lifestyles interfere with their
work. And for a society that regards
marriage and family as a cornerstone,
there is no valid evidence that
homosexuality is contagious.
Most homosexuals aren't out to con-
ert world. Like the rest of us they
merely seek the opportunity to be left
alone, to find a job and a decent place
to live..
UNFORTUNATELY, a society with
values rooted in heterosexuality has
been exceedingly intolerant of devia-
tion. No clause in the U.S. Constitution
explicitly prohibits discrimination
against home sexuals; the constitu-
tional safeguard depends on an infer-
ence that courts have been too slow in
drawing. Thus homosexuals see them-
selves as dependent on protection ex-
pressly supplied by local ordinances.
The point here is not whether
These fears seem excessive and, in homosexuality is admirable; the issue
is whether invidious discrimination is
tolerable. Surely the effects of dis-
crimination based on sexual orienta-
tion can be as damaging as bias based
on race, color or sex.
There are distressing potential side
effects to this emotional debate. For
example, one Madison minister now
threatens to expose homosexuals, in
government. This could produce an
ugly, McCarthy-like atmosphere, with
flimsy accusations smearing public
reputations indiscriminately - the
"straight" along with the unstraight.
The situation also could be loited
for political purposes that have noth-
ing to do with private sexual prefer-
ences.
-
Nonetheless, one healthy conse-
quence of the national debate on
homosexuality is to bring the issue out
of the closet thereby perhaps
changing invalid public attitudes on a
complex subject, and allaying some of
the exaggerated fears that surround
it.
Protective local ordinances will be-
come unnecessary when social matu-
rity makes them so. Until then,
homosexuals will need this extra
ounce of protection to realize basic
rights most of us take for granted.
с-т
5/15/78
---
Bill to ban sex bias mú
gains strong support
By Steve Burkholder
Special to The Journal
Madison, Wis. While proponent
after proponent called for the pas-
sage of a bill that would ban discrim-
ination on the basis of a person's
sexual preference, only one opponent
appeared before a legislative commit-
tee Tuesday.
The Rev. Richard E. Pritchard of
Madison, who said he saw the bill as
chipping away at the community's
moral structure, was the lone voice
of opposition at the hearing before
the Assembly's Health and Human
Services Committee.
Some 15 persons mostly clergy
and members of various homosexual
groups -voiced their strong support
for Assembly Bill 70, which is spon-
sored by Rep. David Clarenbach (D-
Madison).
The Rev. M. Ted Steege of Luther
Memorial Church in Madison said the
bill was not "a pro-homosexuality
bill. It is an anti-bigotry bill."
Committee members asked few
questions during the entire hearing.
"The committee is strangely silent
today," said Rep. John Medinger (D-
La Crosse), noting that there was no
one in attendance to testify against
the bill.
But that was before Pritchard be-
gan to speak in answer to arguments
set forth by those in favor of the bill.
Pritchard said homosexual behav-
ior was a sickness and, while the bill
did not address homosexual behavior
directly, added: "The major part of it
preserves the homosexual practice
and makes it legal in every way."
5/13/81
However, Tony Larsen, a minister
in the Unitarian Universalist Church
of Racine and Kenosha, noted that
the American Psychiatric Association
removed homosexuality from its list
of mental disorders in 1973.
Barbara Lightner, a leader of the
Madison gay group The United, said
there were no statistics to show that
banning discrimination against
homosexuals or of persons per-
ceived as homosexuals in hiring
would somehow allow "child pollu-
tion," or the idea that "just by being
around, you're contagious."
Steege and others testified that the
bill made no moral judgment approv-
ing homosexual behavior. Instead,
they argued, the bill guaranteed basic
civil rights accorded other minority
groups.
The bill bans discrimination in
employment, housing and public ac-
commodations based on the sexual
orientation of an individual.
Under the bill, sexual orientation
is defined as having a preference for
heterosexuality, homosexuality, bi-
sexuality, having a history of such a
preference, or being identified with
such a preference.
247570
---
From around the state...
Appleton Post-Crescent
JUN 16 1981
University budget cuts really hurting
ار
In the last ten years the University of Wis-
consin System has endured a number of fi-
nancial cuts which total several millions of
dollars. Former Gov. Patrick Lucey encour-
aged the first round of cuts almost ten years
ago. The Legislature enthusiastically contin-
ued to reduce the appropriations if not in ac-
tual dollars then in percentages of support
per student.
Part of the problem came from an enroll-
ment formula which worked to the univer-
sity's advantage at first, but as the increases
in numbers of students declined - not the ac-
tual number of students, which continued to
increase the formula was a handicap. An-
other major problem was the refusal of the
Legislature to take into account fixed costs
and adequate consideration for the ever-
growing percentages of part-time students.
But it may also be that the university cried
wolf too often. There didn't appear to be any
major decline in quality or access to cam-
puses until the Medford campus was ordered
closed by the Legislature upon the recom-
mendation of the Board of Regents this
spring. Now the effects of the continued erod-
ing of both quality and access aspects are be
coming very apparent.
The universities at Stevens Point and Stout
have frozen applications for next fall for
some categories of students. Other campuses
I have had to cut back on the numbers of sec-
tions of popular courses. Students are being
warned they may not be able to take courses
required for a major even until the fifth year.
Others must put off needed or desired
courses for a semester or longer. The cut-
backs in access quite naturally mean longer
times spent in the university - and more ex-
penses - for many students.
But while the access to some campuses and
classes can be readily noticed when cut back,
the sarne is not true of the even more impor-
tant quality factor. Lack of library reference
materials, periodicals and resource books,
overloaded classes with too little time for pro-
fessors to note individual problems,
strengths and weaknesses other than exam
results, fewer opportunities for faculty re-
tooling, research and specialization - these
are areas being cut which may drastically af-
fect the quality of education opportunities for
Wisconsin students.
There may have been a time when there
was fat in the university budget. But that is
long past. The university is being nickled and
dimed to becoming a second rate system and
it doesn't seem likely that Wisconsin resi-
dents really want it that way.
Rights of homosexuals become issue again
After the highly controversial bill
to legalize sexual activity between
nonmarried, consenting adults (AB
235) was defeated 50-49 in the state
assembly, many legislators were
hoping that no more such bills
would come before them for the
remainder of the session. That's not
likely, however, since the Senate
version of the bill could be reported
out of committee at any time.
In the meantime, the Assembly
will face a vote soon on AB 70,
which would prohibit
an in-
discrimination based on
dividual's sexual orientation in the
areas of employment, housing, and
public accommodations. It
recently recommended for passage
by the health and human services
committee on an 8 to 6 vote.
measure
was
The
defines sexual
orientation as having a preference
for
heterosexuality,
homosexuality, bi-sexuality, having
a history of such a preference or
with such a
being identified
preference."
Only one opponent appeared
before the committee when a public
hearing was held. Rev. Richard E.
Pritchard,
of
pastor
Congregational Church in Madison,
said the bill is more "chipping away
at the moral strength of our
society." While most proponents,
including ministers from a variety of
religious denominations, testified in
support on the basis that the bill
provided an extension of equal
rights to persons who
are
Rev.
homosexually oriented,
Pritchard disagreed.
He said he has been active in the
civil rights movement, but that no
logical extension could be made for
rights of homosexuals. There are, he
said, certain jobs that homosexuals
should not hold, such as positions at
youth camps.
Rep. David Clarenbach (D-
Madison), the bill's primary author,
disagreed and said, "Fears that
homosexuals may try to convert the
young in our classrooms, disrupt the
peace and stability of neighborhood
or office, or even threaten the
foundations of American family life
are excessive and irrational."
He told the committee that there
are "laws, regulations and rules that
cover misconduct by all persons,
homosexual or heterosexual
sanctions to deal with molesters,
teachers who preach sexual views
when they should teach, with
are
Heritage tenants who
noisy and
disruptive, and with employes who
let their private lifestyles interfere
with their work."
The Wisconsin Catholic Con-
ference has referred legislators and
others requesting information to the
pastoral letter "To Live in Christ
Jesus," prepared by the National
Conference of Catholic Bishops in
1976. While pointing out that
homosexual activity, as
distinguished from orientation, is
morally wrong, the bishops said that
homosexuals have a right to respect,
friendship and justice, and should
community.
have an active role in the Christian
Herald-Citizen-Milwaukee
JUN 13 1981
---
MEDICINE
Sexual heference
Jerry L. Mitchell
Authors Hammersmith, Bell and Weinberg: A biological basis for homosexuality?
Gays Are Born, Not Made
The mystery really is... that I'm not like
all the nice young men I see strolling hand
in hand in Bloomingdale's on Saturday
mornings.
-"Portnoy's Complaint," by Philip Roth
A
lexander Portnoy can hardly believe
he's not gay. After all, he has a mother
whose extraordinary domination over Alex
and his father would lead many psychia-
trists to peg him as a perfect candidate. But
this traditional theory that family relation-
ships make people gay has now been chal-
lenged. Homosexuality, says a new report
from the Alfred C. Kinsey Institute for Sex
Research, has little to do with overbearing
mothers, distant fathers or any other in-
fluences of childhood. Instead, the re-
searchers found, the condition arises from
feelings and needs that appear to be as deep-
rooted and impervious to change as the
heterosexual kind. In some cases, they sug-
gest, homosexuality may even be deter-
mined before birth.
The authors of the new report, psycholo-
gist Alan P. Bell and sociologists Martin S.
Weinberg and Sue Kiefer Hammersmith,
set out to test factors that could conceivably
contribute to homosexuality. In interviews
lasting several hours each, their staff ques-
tioned 979 homosexuals and 477 heterosex-
uals on such matters as early relationships
with their parents, childhood friendships,
youthful sexual and emotional feelings and
traumatic sexual incidents.
The most significant-and unexpected--
finding was that the family backgrounds of
the subjects appeared to have little effect on
eventual sexual preference. For example,
boys who grew up with weak fathers and
42
dominant mothers were almost as likely to
turn out heterosexual as homosexual. In
fact, the significance of boys' relationships
with their mothers in particular was found
by the researchers to be "hardly worth
mentioning." An unsatisfactory relation-
ship with a father for both boys and
girls was only slightly more important in
predicting eventual sexual preference.
One childhood trait recalled by some ho-
mosexual subjects did seem to set them
apart from a large number of the heterosex-
uals. As youngsters, they failed to conform
to generally accepted forms of behavior for
their sex. For boys, this often meant a lack of
interest in sports and an enjoyment of soli-
tary activities like drawing, music and read-
ing. Pre-homosexual girls, on the other
hand, did tend to enjoy sports and outdoor
play, as well as wearing boys' clothes. They
were less interested than the pre-heterosex-
ual girls in activities like playing house,
hopscotch and jacks.
Dating: This "gender nonconformity"
occurred so early in childhood that the
researchers view it as a reflection of an
already-established homosexual propensi-
ty, and not a cause. For girls, gender non-
conformity in childhood was not as reliable
a predictor of adult homosexuality as it was
for boys; in fact, only a third of the hetero-
sexual women said they were "highly femi-
nine" as children. But even in boys, where
the association was stronger, it was not
unequivocal. One-fourth of the heterosex-
ual males described themselves as sexually
nonconforming children, and half the male
homosexuals had been typically masculine
in their childhood interests and activity.
The Kinsey study, which will be pub-
lished in November,* measured-and
eliminated--a number of other potential
factors in the development of homosexual-
ity. Among them: lack of heterosexual dat-
ing experience, childhood isolation from
peers, traumatic early heterosexual experi-
ence and homosexual seduction.
Because the researchers could not find
any strong connection between childhood
experiences and adult homosexuality, they
suggest that the orientation "may arise from
a biological precursor that parents cannot
control." Such a correlation has yet to be
shown scientifically, but the investigators
hope their study will stimulate research into
possible physiological differences between
homosexuals and heterosexuals.
The Kinsey study is expected to provoke
criticism from both the psychoanalytic
community and homosexual groups. Some
gay activists, the researchers note, view any
investigation of the origins of homosexual-
ity as an indirect attack. And many psychia-
trists refuse to dismiss the family's role in
explaining sexual differences. "Unless chil-
dren grow up on an island without adults
around," says Dr. Lawrence J. Hatterer, a
New York psychoanalyst who has studied
thousands of homosexuals in his practice,
"parents will remain important influences
on sexual development and choice."
Clearly, the authors of the new report
don't pretend to have a final answer. But
they do firmly believe that the role of par-
ents in determining sexual preference has
been "grossly exaggerated." Yet parents
can certainly help a child adjust to his indi-
vidual sexuality, they advise, by supplying
plenty of care, sympathy and devotion.
JEAN SELIGMANN with MARIANA GOSNELL
What Happens When
The Shrink's Away
The symptoms are well documented: an-
ger, resentment, envy and loneliness. The
disease recurs year after year, typically in
late summer. Most victims recover by La-
bor Day, even without treatment. While the
degree of pain may vary, the cause is always
the same: the annual migration of psychia-
trists from their offices to the beaches of
New England and the châteaux of Europe.
What is a patient to do when his psychiatrist
abandons him for a month?
Freud used to invite selected patients to
accompany him on vacation. But most pa-
tients must make do with the name of one of
their doctor's associates, who can be con-
sulted in an emotional emergency. And
without the familiar schedule and support
of therapy, many of them find it hard to
cope. Last month in New York a workshop
called "What to Do When Your Shrink Is
on Vacation" drew more than two dozen
participants in various stages of bewilder-
ment. "Now I'm involved with her, and
she's gone away," said one young man,
*Sexual Preference: Its Development in Men and Wom-
en." Indiana University Press.
NEWSWEEK/SEPTEMBER 7, 1981
---
ms
1/27/82
The
Morning
Mail
"Treat everyone fairly'
To The Sentinel:
In response to the "Concerned
Parent" who wrote concerning As-
sembly Bill 70, which prohibits dis-
crimination based upon sexual orien-
tation, I am also a concerned parent.
I am concerned that, if the bill does
not pass, it will be one more indica-
tion that this is not a free country
and that we do not have equal rights
under the law.
I want my children to have every
right that is theirs under the law of
the land and of God. I know that God
wills that every person be free and
be treated fairly, as do the more than
50 clergy who have signed support
for this bill and at least seven major
religious denominations and the 14
medical and professional groups (in-
cluding the National Education Asso-
ciation and the American Psychiatric
Association) and the 17 major corpo-
rations.
To give homosexuals the right to
fair housing and employment will
not change affirmative action policy,
nor will it lessen the laws already on
the books for the protection we all
deserve as citizens. AB-70 does not
give homesexuals freedom to act out
their sexuality in socially unaccepta-
ble ways or ways which will harm
anyone else.
Fear and ignorance cause us to act
in prejudicial ways, even to the ex-
tent of denying others their natural
rights. We have got to rise above our
personal fears and ignorance and al-
low everyone the rights that they
deserve.
It is not only the will of the foun-
ders of this country that all be free,
but also the will of God. Until all are
granted their rightful freedoms, none
of us will be free. I am concerned for
my children because I know that we
are not all free and treated equally,
and I am committed to do my best to
gain their freedom while I can.
REV. EDWARD S. SYKES,
Rector,
St. Mark's Episcopal Church,
Milwaukee.
---
X
31
Ashland Daily Press
MAR
1982
FATS-3-17-82
Notes to the North-By State Sen. Dan Theno
Governor Dreyfus is
treating the people of
Wisconsin to a new show -
his budget balancing act. He
is tiptoeing across a high,
tightrope with a tax increase
in one hand and the promise
of proprty tax relief in the
other.
heating fuel, are exempt
from the tax.
Critics will even go out on
a limb and say the sales is a
regressive tax because these
exemptions benefit all
people, not just the needy.
I will accept the notion
that the sales tax is less than
perfect. But I know of no
tax, be it the sales, income or
property tax, that is perfect.
And I have yet to meet
except
anyone
Democratic legislator who
thinks any of them are.
a
Cheering him on are the
people of Wisconsin. They
seem to like his proposal to
balance the budget by in-
creasing the sales tax by one
cent. The part that is really
popular is the promise to use
those milions, once the The Democrats, of course,
budget is balanced, for really like the income tax. It
significant property Tax is the fairest of the fair, they
relief.
say, because it is based on
ability to pay. In theory they
are right. In practice,
however, there comes a point
when a tax ceases to be fair
because it is simply too high.
That is the
in
Wisconsin, with income tax.
In 1980, a middle income
family of four paid more
state income tax than a
similar family in any other
state in the nation. In income
taxes paid by all income
levels, Wisconsin ranked
fourth in the nation. In
property taxes we rank 16th
in the nation. And in sales
tax, Wisconsin is 33rd.
Taking potshots at the
Governor are some
legislators, two Democratic
candidates for governor and
the mayor of Milwaukee.
They hope the Governor will
fall flat on his face. At the
very least, they want him to
drop his sales tax proposal.
The sales tax, even though
it is popular among voters,
has a bad reputation among
those who pretend to know
about such things. They have
labeled the sales tax as a
regressive tax which means it
is less than perfect.
Low income families, the
critics say, tend to lose a
greater proportion of their
income with a sales tax hike
than with an income tax
hike. The Governor,
however, would counter with
this fact: the necessities of
life, such as food, medical
and dental services and
case
Now which of those
should we raise to meet our
budget crisis?
Critics of the Governor's
sales tax/property tax relief
proposal say it is unfair
because more populated
counties with a large sales tax
base will benefit the most. It
Tuesday, March 2, 1982 The Post-Crescent Appleton-Neenah-Menasha, Wis. A
Law protects sexual preference
Gov. Lee Dreyfus was right when he signed
legislation banning discrimination in hous-
ing, public accommodations and employ-
ment based upon an individual's sexual pref-
erence.
The governor was obviously very careful in
his statements concerning his reasons for
signing the bill which can be regarded as a
defense of homosexual behavior. "I have
decided to sign for one basic reason, to pro-
tect one's right to privacy," he read from a
prepared statement, itself unusual in
Dreyfus' ordinary off the cuff remarks.
Homosexuals have come out of the closet in
recent years and this has upset some Ameri-
cans. Those who base their discomfiture upon
religious reasons obviously have no business
trying to impose their beliefs upon other
Americans except by persuasion. The Fox
Valley Family Forum was among those
organizations pressuring Gov. Dreyfus to
veto the bill. But its members ought to recog-
nize the difference between opposing homo-
sexual behavior within their own church
groups or families and demanding it from
others. The reasons for homosexual behavior
are not agreed upon in the medical and scien-
tific community. In many ways it would seem
to be less of a threat to the morals of young
people, especially in crimes of violence, than
heterosexual urges.
is ironic that this criticism
comes from Democratic
legislators who have sent a
disproportionate percentage
of shared revenues to urban
areas where they say the bills
are higher.
Areas where tourism is a
significant part of the
economic base will also
benefit under the Governor's
proposal. Visitors to the area
will generate sales tax
revenue that will help
residents by providing
property tax relief.
In northwest Wisconsin
where a large part of the
economy is based on the
tourism trade, this is good
news. Counties will, under
this plan, have the option of
provide more
trying to
property tax relief by trying
to generate more sales tax
revenue. In short, boost
and we relieve
tourism
property taxes.
Two final points should be
made about the Governor's
proposal. The first is this: I
believe he inadvertently
created the impression that
property taxes everywhere
will be wiped out if this
proposal is passed. That is
not
true. The revenue
generated by a sales tax
increase will be applied only
to the county levy which
comprises about 20 percent
of the average tax bill in
Wisconsin.
If enacted, however, the
Governor's proposal will still
be the largest single property
tax relief measure in the
history of Wisconsin.
The second thing that
should be remembered about
the Governor's budget
balancing package is that the
The same sort of dispute surfaced with
President Reagan's nomination of the Rev.
Samuel Hart for a seat on the U.S. Civil
Rights Commission. Apparently some of the
president's misled advisers thought that
merely appointing a black minister was
enough for easy confirmation. But the Rev.
Hart has expressed opposition to the Equal
Rights Amendment and his opinion that
homosexuals don't have a civil rights cause.
The Leadership Coalition on Civil Rights,
largely a black organization, called his nomi-
nation an insult. The Rev. Hart, undoubtedly
with White House pressure, has withdrawn
his name.
Rep. David Clarenbach was the principle
sponsor of the bill passed by the Wisconsin
Legislature and signed by the governor. Cla-
renbach now wants to decriminalize certain
laws regarding sexual activity among con-
senting adults. The laws are ridiculous from
both an enforcement and moral point of view.
What business do governments - or employ-
ers have in other people's bedroom's?
There are and should be serious concerns
about sexual permissive attitudes, especially
among young people today. But these are
matters for parents, religious figures and
other community leaders to address and not
for the government of Wisconsin or members
of the Civil Rights Commission.
sales tax proposal is only one
of several tax increases he is
proposing to meet our
budget deficit of some $450
million..
He has also proposed a
temporary surtax on all.
corporations for 1982 and
1983. This will raise $46
million. Two other changes
in the corporate tax laws will
raise another $20 million.
Applying the sales tax to
interstate phone calls will
raise $17.3 million. The
Governor also wants to raise
the cigarette tax from 20 to
23 cents on a pack. That will
add some $18 million to the
state treasury.
In addition to taxes, the
Governor has proposed cuts
in state spending including a
freeze on salary increases for
state employees who make
more than $30,000.
The philosophy behind all
of this is to spread the pain,
as one official put it. We are,
after all, dealing with a
deficit of unprecendented
SO un-
proportions
precedented action is called
for.
If we cut more from the
state budget we would,
inevitably, have to reduce
aids for schools and local
governments. That would
create the need for local
goverments to raise property.
taxes.
So sentiment seems to be
running in favor of the
Governor's approach of a
tax increase in one hand and
the prospect of property tax
relief in the other. It seems to
provide the balance we need
and, at the moment anyway,
it's the best act in town.
What's your opinion?
---
CATHOLIC COALITION
FOR GAY CIVIL RIGHTS
SOCIAL JUSTICE
As Roman Catholics we believe
that proclaiming the kingdom of God
necessarily demands a vigorous pub-
lic ministry of liberation from both
personal and social forces that op-
press people. Christian love also de-
mands the recognition of the dignity
and rights of all our neighbors. Per-
sons with a homosexual orientation
are oppressed people and also our
neighbors. They have a full and equal
claim upon our love and understand-
ing and upon the sensitive and en-
lightened pastoral concern of our
Church.
In their November, 1976, pastoral
letter, To Live In Jesus Christ, the
Catholic bishops of the United States
declared that homosexual persons
"should not suffer from prejudice
against their basic human rights"
and that they have a right to "re-
spect, justice and friendship" and
"an active role in the Christian com-
munity." We affirm the need for the
Church to motivate people constantly
to desist from discriminatory atti-
tudes and activities. We applaud the
efforts of other Catholic groups such
as the National Coalition of American
Nuns, the National Assembly of Reli-
gious Brothers and the National
Federation of Priests' Councils to
eradicate all forms of misunderstand-
ing, ignorance and fear surrounding
the topic of homosexuality and gay
rights. We believe, however, that it is
the sacred responsibility of all Catho-
lic citizens to work for the establish-
ment of a society based on justice in
its law and practices.
We urge Catholic leaders in partic-
ular to take the lead in describing and
defending the civil rights of gay per-
sons. We oppose any practice that
permits individuals and institutions
to discriminate against homosexual
persons because of sexual orienta-
tion, which we believe cannot be
identified solely with behavior. We
believe that sexual orientation is at
least as much a part of the human
identity of some individuals as is
color, race, sex or creed. We strongly
support protective legislation on all
levels of society that guarantees gay
persons the same basic human and
civil rights enjoyed by all other
groups, including rights relative to
housing, employment and accommo-
dations. While being sensitive to the
complexity of the issues involved and
recognizing the rights of other groups
in society, we reject the unproved as-
sumption that protection in law for
gay persons endorses any particular
"lifestyle" any more than law guar-
anteeing religious freedom endorses
a particular religious denomination.
MYTHS
We deplore the unfounded fear
that homosexuality contributes to the
breakdown of family life. On the con-
trary, we believe that negative social
attitudes toward gay persons en-
courage many homosexual individu-
als to enter heterosexual unions,
many of which. later end in divorce
and heartache for all involved. We
believe it is the parental and peer re-
jection of gay persons that contri-
butes more to the disintegration of
family life/We believe that there are
no real grounds for the fear that gay
teachers exert undue influence on
young people in regard to sexual
orientation, any more than do ag-
nostics, non-Catholics divorced per-
sons or teachers holding a variety of
religious or ethical-moral views. We
do not believe that heterosexual
youths can be "converted" to homo-
sexuality. Gay persons do not choose
heterosexuality, despite the constant
presence and example of heterosex-
ual parents and role models in their
early years of socialization. For a
variety of reasons one's sexual
orientation seems to be discovered
rather than chosen and is a much
more complex phenomenon than a
simple heterosexual-homosexual di-
chotomy.
ACTIONS
The Church's courageous defense
of human rights remains ineffective if
not forcefully embodied in the life and
structures of local Catholic communi-
ties. For this reason we pledge our-
selves to work for the elimination of
discriminatory and unchristian atti-
tudes and practices in our parishes,
schools, diocesan offices, chanceries,
seminaries, religious communities
and the Catholic media. We will work
to implement the resolutions of the
1976 United States Catholic Bishops'
"Call to Action" conference in
Detroit to:
1. actively seek to serve the
needs of those persons with a
homosexual orientation;
2. root out structures and attitudes
which foster discrimination;
3. provide pastoral care to all
sexual minorities who are sub-
jected to societal discrimination
and alienation;
4. provide information, counseling
and support to families whose
members are part of a sexual
minority.
In light of our Church's constant
teachings on social justice, we urge
all Catholics to support sound civil
rights legislation on both federal and
local levels, and not to oppose such
ordinances on the basis of unfounded
fears, irrational myths and inflamma-
tory statements about homosexual
persons. We call upon all members of
the Catholic community, especially
our pastors, theologians, bishops, re-
ligious women and men, to join with
us in this effort to provide leadership
and witness in this ministry of justice,
healing and reconciliation.
---
WASHINGTON-Even a quick look
at events in Washington and around
the country shows that the Christian
right's attack on gay civil rights is tak-
ing on new life and intensity. The out-
come is uncertain, but two things are
clear: The Moral Majority will stop at
nothing to make scapegoats of gay
people, and the gay community is
becoming more united as a result. In
this climate, nothing less than extend-
ing civil rights laws to cover gays will
end the political and moral outrages
coming into view.
The clearest signal of the Moral Ma-
jority's intentions came Oct. 1 when it
persuaded the House of Representa-
tives to overturn a revised sex-assault
bill recently passed by the District of
Columbia city council that decriminal-
ized sodomy between consenting adults
in private. The measure, which had
been requested by Congress and was
similar to measures already in effect in
at least 25 states, drew support from a
coalition that included the National
Conservative Political Action Commit-
tee and Washington's "Mother of the
Year." There was no reason to believe
that Congress would intervene to block
the act during the pro forma 30-day
waiting period before it became law.
The Congressional veto was
prompted by the Rev. Jerry Falwell's
claims that gay men and lesbians are
exerting too much influence in local
Washington politics. Unable to counter
their political weight in a city where
the Moral Majority has no strength,
Mr. Falwell wanted Congress to rule
that their private lives are criminal.
What he asked for and got from his
supporters in the House was a veto
that virtually excommunicates gays
from the body politic in Washington.
Nor is that the only sign of increas-
ing hostility toward gays. Attorney
General William French Smith re-
cently took a public swipe at "so-
called fundamental rights," including
the "right to sexual privacy" - and
now President Reagan's Justice De-
'Majority'
Vs.
Gays
By Larry Bush
partment will be expected to define the
limits of such rights.
The White House has also confirmed,
that it is considering backing even
more extreme legislation proposed by
the Moral Majority. The "Family Pro-
tection Act" now pending in Congress
would, among other things, deny all
Federal funds to any person or group
that even "suggests" that homosex-
uality is an acceptable "life style" and
effectively deny matching Federal
funds to any candidate for public office
who supports gay civil rights.
While most Americans are unaware
of this assault on civil liberties, lesbians
and gay men are increasingly con-
cerned and are organizing. That is
their only protection against the hos-
tility gaining strength throughout the
country. In January, Austin, Tex., will
consider a referendum that sanctions
discrimination against gays by land-
lords and real estate agents; gays in
cities everywhere feel that the police
are turning a blind eye to street assaults
on people taken to be homosexuals.
Those assaults now include rapes of gay
men as well as lesbians who are kid-
napped as they leave local bars, knife
slayings on the street, and even shooting
deaths of unarmed gay men by police
officers in Houston and Los Angeles.
Many gays believe that this violence is
linked to the rise in anti-gay political
rhetoric.
Both the street assaults and the politi-
cal attack will be at issue in New York
City today and tomorrow. Tonight, gay.
men and lesbians will gather on the first
anniversary of the death of two men shot.
by a machine gun through a window of
the West Village's Ramrod Bar. Tomor-
row, the City Council is to hold hearings
on a bill to forbid discrimination based
on sexual orientation.
The increasing prejudice and violence
is forcing gays to accept that their pri-
vate lives are a political issue. They are
caught in the bind noted recently by
Mayor-elect Andrew Young, as he ac-
knowledged the new political power of
Atlanta's gay community: "The objec-
tive is to get rid of the intrusion of the
state and society. The irony is that in
order to do that you've got to make it a
public issue."
Gays are also gaining political power i
in other cities, for example in Houston
where they won a commitment from the
newly elected mayor to fire the police
chief, and in Wisconsin where the As-
sembly recently passed a bill forbidding
discrimination against them. The Wis-
consin measure, which is expected to be
approved and made law by the state
Senate early next year, is supported not
only by the gay community but also by
the state's religious leaders, including
the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Mil-
waukee.
Such cooperation acknowledges that
what is at stake is not only protecting
gays from abuse but reaffirming that
prejudice is unacceptable. The question
is not whether gays are winning and
Jerry Falwell is losing. But if the anti-
gay campaign is rejected, the victory
will be for the principle that a person's
sexuality is private, and that it cannot
be abused and exploited by those who
would use it as a ready source for fund-
raising, hate campaigns, cheap votes,
and political posturing.
Larry Bush writes about national
issues for The Advocate and The New
York Native, both biweekly papers.
---
CT 2/25/82
Dreyfus signs sex preference bill
By MATT POMMER
Capital Times Staff Writer
Gov. Lee Dreyfus today signed a
bill prohibiting discrimination against
people because of their sexual orien-
tation.
Wisconsin is the first state to have
such a law. It bars discrimination in
employment, housing, and public ac-
commodations.
Dreyfus said that he felt asking
questions about sexual persuasion
was a "totally unwarranted invasion
of privacy," according to William
Kraus, his communications director.
A veto of the measure would have
assumed that employers, landlords,
and others could have asked those
questions, according to Kraus.
The governor was the object of an
intense lobbying campaign on the
issue.
State Rep. David Clarenbach,
D-Madison, said Dreyfus had come
down on the "side of sexual privacy-
that one person's lifestyle ought not to
have anything to do with their em-
ployablity or their right to rent an
apartment.
"I think it is consistent with that Re-
publican principle of removing gov-
ernmental interference from the pri-
vate lives of individuals and the pro-
tection from discrimination of all mi-
norities," said Clarenbach, the chief
author of the bill.
"The issue which he has decided fa-
vorably on is not whether homosex-
uality itself is admirable, but whether
discrimination and bigotry can be tol-
erated," added Clarenbach.
Clarenbach said Wisconsin is the
first state to have this type of law on
the books, although three other states
have executive orders by their gover-
nors to do the same thing for employ-
ment in the public sector.
The bill passed the bill Assembly on
a 49 to 45 vote and then was adopted
by the State Senate on a voice vote
after a motion to kill it failed, 19 to 13.
The Senate tacked on an amend-
ment that prohibits requiring the use
of affirmative action to implement
the bill.
---
On, Wisconsin
An Editorial
New 'gay rights' law
sadly necessary
Should homosexuals have le-
gal protection against discrimi-
nation? Gov. Dreyfus and the
State Legislature deserve praise
for courageously confronting
that socially explosive question
and answering "yes." Dreyfus
has signed into law a bill that
prohibits discrimination against
homosexuals in employment,
housing and public accommoda-
tions.
The law is likely to provoke
controversy, as the governor
noted. People who would not
countenance discrimination on
the grounds of race, sex, reli-
gion, age or national origin often
cannot find tolerance for homo-
sexuals. Many people feel that to
outlaw bias against homosexuals
is, in some way, to condone or
promote the gay lifestyle.
However, the issue is not
homosexuality. The issue is an
unpardonable form of discrimi-
nation.
As Dreyfus put it, the new law
offers protection of the right to
privacy in one's sexual prefer-
ence, and helps keep government
involvement in private lives
"very restricted." By banning
job and housing discrimination,
the law places an "additional
limitation on one more area of
governmentally sanctioned in-
quiry into an individual's
thoughts, beliefs and feelings,"
Dreyfus said.
Yet, the law does not injure
the protections that rightly are
provided against criminal or as-
saultive sexual conduct. More-
over, the new law does not es-
tablish "gay quotas" for employ-
ers. It does not sanction expres-
sion of sexual preferences in
classrooms.
Dreyfus and the lawmakers
can be proud that Wisconsin
now forbids sexual-preference
discrimination, as it has forbid-
den other forms of bias. What is
regrettable is that intolerance
made the law necessary.
MJ 2/26/82
---
Janesville.
orge P. Koshollek
struggle Monday by Dane County.
Deputy Richard Raemisch and two
federal officials.
Teira was arrested Feb. 11 on a
charge of selling about $225,000
worth of cocaine to undercover offi-
cers.
He assumed the identity of a man
being held on a non-support charge
ijuana were in his possession at the
time of arrest Monday, Lackey said.
of arrest
Lackey said he expected Teira to
be sent to Newark, N.J., where he is
wanted for jumping bail on a federal
drug smuggling charge before he is
returned here for prosecution.
Three other people have been
charged in connection with the Dane
County escape.
hotels ger
>ons parts found in prison
Sentinel
caliber cartridges and authorities had
cheard rumors of weapons being
stored within the prison, he said.
1 cases of parts
make zip guns,
and about six
onfiscated dur-Asked whether officials feared a
kedown at the possible riot, Manthe said,
al Institution, "Naturally, when you get rumors
rl Manthe said there may be weapons, it's some-
thing you might think possible."
r during the
egan Jan. 26,
id drug para-
nade knives,
un began after
F
He said about 160 conduct reports
on inmates have been completed as a
result of the shakedown.
163190.
Some of the inmates were placed
in isolation or lost other privileges,
Manthe said..
ind three .22-In a related development, Manthe
said nurses and other union employes
who had stayed off their jobs in the
health services unit for several days
last week because of fears for their
safety, were back at work Monday..
"The health services unit seems to
be functioning well," Manthe said.
As the result of talks last week
between State Division of Correc
tions officials and health care unit
employes, a prison guard who had
been removed recently from the unit
was returned.
W
At least two nurses and a nursing
supervisor resigned during the dis-
pute.
terally Halt to mining
not expected
d: 'You're not really going
you?'" Smetana said. "He
But when he realized I to affect state
explained where I was to
eeded to do."
A
riends tease him and most
have been silent about his
1 it is easy to complain
ent without getting in-
ugh to vote and to fight
7 and I'm old enough to
fice," he said.
i honor student and a var-
layer.
signed from the Student
igh school because it was
i a waste of time.
about the amount of time
e, but I have learned that
need to do a job varies
" he said.
ependent, he said he did
bels because they some-
ple from being honest
90
20
te
lion annually, 59% of Wisconsin's
farm income, with the state produc-
ing more than 17% of the nation's
dairy products.
Last year, 67.8% of the state's
milk production went into cheese,
much of which went into govern-
ment warehouses under the current
price-support program.
-
Wisconsin farmers received an
average of $12.64 a hundredweight
for milk of all grades, slightly more
than the national average of $12.43,
but less than the $13.25 support
price.
Full parity would be about $16.40.
The federal government is holding
about 250 million pounds of butter,
547 million pounds of cheese and 898
million pounds of non-fat dried milk.
Gunderson and Cropp laid the
blame for the rising total of govern-
ment-held dairy products to the entry
into the dairy business of corpora-
tions in California and Idaho, which
operate on a much larger scale than
the family dairy farms of Wisconsin.
They said the dairy price-support
program, in effect since 1949, had
grain prices fell so low that corpora-
kept the dairy industry stable until
tions previously raising grain moved
into the dairy industry.
#digit
Radio stations spur
calls to governor
Madison -AP- Interior Secre-Madison
Sentinel Madison Bureau
Gov. Dreyfus' office received more than 600
tary James Watt's proposed morato- telephone calls Monday concerning a bill that would pro-
rium on mining and drilling in feder-hibit discrimination against homosexuals.
al wilderness areas probably will
have no effect in Wisconsin, a US
Forest Service official said Monday.
Wisconsin's only official wilder-
ness area is the 6,583-acre Rainbow
Lake Wilderness Area in the Chequa-
megon National Forest in Bayfield
I County. There have been no applica-
tions by mining companies for explo-
ration permits for that area, said
Jack Jacks, regional geologist in the
Forest Service's eastern district head-
quarters in Milwaukee.
Watt announced Sunday that he
will ask Congress to declare the
moratorium through 2000 on mineral
exploration in US wilderness areas.
By
By late in the day, 406 callers had registered their sup-
port for the bill, while 216 opposed it. Many apparently
were spurred by announcements over WORT-FM, a listen-
er-supported station in Madison.
Last Friday, the governor's office received 370 calls after
comments on the bill by two Christian radio stations,
WVCY-FM in Milwaukee and WNWC-FM in Madison. The
total that day was 350 against the bill and 20 in favor.
The bill, which awaits action by Dreyfus, would prohibit
discrimination in housing, jobs and public accommodations
based on a person's sexual preference.
નારા
Terry FitzPatrick, WORT-FM news director, said inter-
ested persons may place whatever they want on the sta-
tion's announcement board. It is up to individual program-
mers to read the messages on the air if they wish.
A Dreyfus aide said a priest at St. Paul's Catholic Church
on the University of Wisconsin - Madison campus has
urged persons to call Dreyfus asking him to sign the bill.
Milwaukee Sentinel
Tuesday, Feb 22 1943
23.1942
Page 5, Part 1
---
'Life' sentence could be twice as tough in future
By Charles E. Friederich
Journal Madison Bureau
Madison, Wis. A convict sen-
tenced to life in prison would remain
behind bars at least 25 years - twice
the minimum now under a crimi-
nal sentencing bill passed by the As-
sembly Thursday night.
But after heated debate, the As-
sembly scuttled an amendment under
which life imprisonment would real-
ly have meant life.
The bill was passed, 89-6, and sent
to an uncertain fate in the Senate. In
a 22-hour floor wrangle, the Assem-
bly moderately toughened a weaker
bill advanced a day earlier by a
committee.
The version passed by the Assem-
bly still wasn't as tough as the fixed-
sentencing bill it started out to be.
The original measure (A-29), by Rep.
Louise Tesmer (D-Milwaukee),
would have curtailed early release by
parole.
Tesmer said she was satisfied with
the final version, even though it
stopped short of fixed or determinate
sentencing.
Under the bill, if a felon is sen-
tenced to prison, he would have to
serve at least 30% of his term, minus
time off for good behavior. The dis-
count for good behavior would be
one day for each five days served.
Longer for repeaters
Repeat felons would serve longer
terms. Under an amendment by Rep.
Tommy Thompson (R-Elroy), a per-
son committing a felony while on
parole or probation for a felony
would receive a mandatory sentence
of at least 50% of the maximum sen-
tence for the subsequent felony. He
I would have to serve half that sen-
tence before becoming eligible for
parole.
An amendment offered by Rep.
John Norquist (D-Milwaukee) caused
a stir and three roll call votes before
it was finally tabled, 74-21.
Norquist, who had voted against
the bill in the Joint Finance Commit-
tee, proposed that lifers serve life,
with no possibility for parole.
"The public expects a life sentence
to be a life sentence," Norquist said.
Supporting the amendment, Rep.
Lois Plous (D-Milwaukee) said:
"We're doing all these crime busting
bills here. Well, I think we ought to
have in
Prisoners
Rep. Mordecai Lee (D-Milwaukee) Some legislators
assailed Norquist's amendment as
"the most barbaric, uncivilized, un-
Christian proposal that's come before
us in a long time." Other lawmakers
accused Norquist of trying to scuttle
the bill by attaching a highly contro-
versial provision.
11 years now
Under existing law, a person sen-
tenced to life becomes eligible for
parole in 11 years, 3 months. Under
the bill, parole eligibility begins in 25
years.
X Sex laws are next target: Clarenbach Court backs
AP, Journal Madison Bureau
Madison, Wis. After the signing of a
gay rights law, the bill's sponsor, Rep.
David Clarenbach, said he would renew
his efforts to decriminalize certain laws
regarding sexual activity between con-
senting adults.
Gov. Dreyfus Thursday signed into law
a measure banning discrimination in
housing, public accommodations and
employment based on a person's sexual
preference.
Wisconsin thus became the first state
to dopt such a law through a legislative
act according to Clarenbach, a Madison
Democrat who represents Madison's
downtown and campus areas.
Also on hand for the signing was Leon
Rouse of Milwaukee, representing the
Committee for Fundamental Judeo-
Christian Human Rights.
Clarenbach said that a push to decrimi-
nalize some sex acts would not be made
until the 1983 session. A similar measure
was killed in this session by the Assem-
bly, 50-49.
Dreyfus, under pressure from mem-
bers of fundamentalist religious groups
to veto the bill, stated in signing the
measure that it had the support "of a
wide-ranging group of religious leader-
ship, including leadership of the Roman
Committee endorses bond for performers
Madison, Wis. -AP- The Assem-
bly's Revenue Committee Thursday
endorsed a proposal that would re-
quire professional sports players,
stage personalities and other travel-
ing entertainers to file bonds to guar-
antee their their state income taxes
will be paid.
The bill by Rep. Gus Menos (D-
Glendale) has been attacked by arena
managers, sports promoters, fair
commissions and booking agents
I who say high-salaried entertainers
may be frightened away from the
state.
However, Rep. Marlin Schneider
(D-Wisconsin Rapids), chairman of
the committee, said it was poor pub-
lic policy to let entertainers get away
with ignoring state tax laws.
The bill that was endorsed 8-1
would require a performer to file a
bond equal to 6% of Wisconsin earn-
ings exceeding $3,200. It would have
to be filed two days before the per-
formance.
An amendment also applies the bill
to professional speakers.
Catholic Church, several Lutheran syn-
ods and the Jewish community."
If discrimination based on sexual pref-
erence is allowed, inquiries into the pri-
vate lives of individuals would follow,
Dreyfus said.
Dreyfus also signed bills that would:
Increase penalties for illegal possession
of prescription drugs (A-297).
Outlaw intimidation of witnesses to
crimes (A-398).
Revise laws regulating nursing homes
(S-263).
Regulate transportation of deer (A52).
cable firms
Journal Madison Bureau
Turn to Prisoners, Page 6
Madison, Wis. - The State Public
Service Commission was ordered
Thursday to stop regulating rates
that utilities charge cable television
companies for using utility poles.
Circuit Judge Robert R. Pekows-
ky, Madison, in issuing the tempo-
rary injunction, said the cable compa-
nies had a good chance of winning
their lawsuit against PSC regulation
of agreements between cable compa-
nies and utilities.
The Wisconsin Cable Communica-
tions Association had asked for the
injunction in a lawsuit filed last Sep-
tember, contending that the PSC in-
validly claimed jurisdiction over reg-
ulation of attachments to poles.
The commission had claimed juris-
diction in a letter to the Federal
Communications Commission shortly
after passage of a federal law that
assigned such regulation to the feder-
al agency, unless states already were
regulating pole attachments.
In its lawsuit, the association said
the letter was like an administrative
rule but did not conform to the law
governing administrative rules.
It also asserted that the commis-
sion had no specific legal authority to
regulate pole attachments, but relied
on its general authority.
Pekowsky said that until he ruled
on those points in the basic lawsuit,
the commission must notify the FCC
that it could not regulate rates and
conditions for attachments to poles
and would not regulate them until
such regulation was allowed by a
court.
urged no parole
From Page 1
Tesmer's original bill would have required con-
struction of four major prisons costing up to $144
million, with annual operating costs estimated at
up to $26 million. The version passed by the As-
sembly would be about half as expensive, al-
though exact cost estimates were not available.
The Assembly also:
Passed, 84-12, a bill revising insanity defense
procedures in criminal cases. The bill (A-765) was
sent to the Senate.
Passed, 95-1, and sent to the Senate a bill (A-
1013) giving municipalities additional powers to
borrow for harbor improvements. The bill was
backed by farm organizations and the City of
Milwaukee, which said it would facilitate con-
struction of an export grain elevator.
Passed, 93-2, a bill making public teacher con-
tracts and tenure a permissible subject of collec-
tive bargaining (A-727). The bill, supported by
teacher unions and school boards, was sent to the
Senate.
6% late-tax penalty
backed by Assembly
Journal Madison Bureau
Madison, Wis.- Delinquent prop-
erty-tax payers could be penalized
for their tardiness under legislation
sent to Gov. Dreyfus Thursday.
The Assembly voted final approv-
al, 83-13, of a bill allowing local units
of government to assess a 6% penal-
ty for late payment, on top of the
12% interest allowed by current law.
The Senate had approved the meas-
ure last week, 27-4.
The bill had been sought by Mil-
waukee and some other municipali-
ties. They claimed that taxpayers
were making money by delaying
payment and investing their unpaid
taxes at interest rates exceeding
12%.
The measure (A-324) is a compro-
mise between earlier Senate and As-
sembly versions. The Assembly bill
had called for 18% interest. The
Senate version called for an 18%
penalty. Interest is deductible from
income taxes; penalties are not.
Under the compromise, the unit of
government that collects the tax
would decide whether to assess the
6% penalty. Localities also would be
permitted to exempt owner-occupied
residences and farms from the penal-
ty.
82
2-26-
2-m3-
---
with what amounts to an economic bill
of rights.
"We have been brainwashed by
the business community into believing
that the only way of securing jobs and
economic stability is by surrendering
to the demands for corporate welfare,"
Clarenbach says.
He cites G. Heileman Brewery's
successful appeal for protectionist
legislation to prevent what it said was
an unfriendly takeover: "They told us
to jump and we asked, 'How high?' on
the way up. Two weeks later, chuck-
ling all the way to the bank, G.
Heileman sold out to those same
people, but they were able to crank up
the sale price and walk away with
several million dollars of additional
profits. We were made the fools."
In a similar vein, Clarenbach calls
Chrysler Corp.'s recent announcement
that it will close its Kenosha plant "a
classic example of corporate irrespon-
sibility and the severe violation of a
social contract. It must impress upon
the political leaders of the state the
insanity of our constant tendency to
succumb to those kind of pipe
dreams."
Clarenbach's proposed economic
democracy legislation calls for new
controls on corporations doing
business in Wisconsin, more vigorous
measures to create jobs and a commit-
ment to such progressive ideals as
health coverage for the uninsured.
Although it was introduced in the As-
sembly more than three years ago, the
bill has failed to pick up much
momentum. But Clarenbach continues
to speak out on its behalf.
"Just as the Constitution guaran-
tees our political rights, we in the
legislature ought to be guaranteeing
economic rights as well," says Claren-
bach. "My function is to remind the
legislature of tomorrow's agenda. The
economic democracy bill lays the
groundwork for issues of the future."
MAKING A DEAL
Chief among Clarenbach's recent
legislative accomplishments is the
establishment of a lake district for the
Yahara Watershed. After decades of
discussion over lakes management in
Dane County, Clarenbach proposed
the establishment of a new level of
government to accomplish the task.
The proposal so riled County Board
members and Jonathan Barry that they
countered with their own plan for a
rivers and lakes management
committee.
A compromise was reached in
late January to retain county control
through a five-member commission
with taxing and regulating powers.
"David is getting out of this deal
essentially what he had advocated in
terms of the initial legislation,"
concedes Barry. "He's certainly getting
from it what he had proposed."
"I think we all got what we
wanted," Clarenbach agrees. "It was
not a compromise in the sense of
concessions made on one side or
another. We succeeded in putting egos
and turf battles aside and identifying
our common goal."
Clarenbach says the provisions of
the compromise agreement are better
than either his original plan or the
county's. And he feels the lakes
management consolidation, which was
approved by the Assembly last week,
is his greatest legislative accomplish-
ment to date in terms of its signifi-
cance to the future of the Madison
area.
"I think there have been other
issues, sex law reform, and some of the
other privacy and civil liberties issues,
that are of greater significance to
individuals," he says. "But the Yahara
plan will have the most impact on the
community as a whole. "It is for future
generations that this reform is most
significant."
CONGRESSMAN CLARENBACH?
What of David Clarenbach's
political future? Many observors
assume he is biding his time until the
congressional seat now held by Robert
Kastenmeier opens up, a prospect
Clarenbach approaches with character-
istic tact.
"I would be honored to be a
member of Congress and represent
this district," Clarenbach says. "But
I'm not hot to trot to run for Congress.
"This may sound like a canned
response, but there's no better
congressman than Bob Kastenmeier.
And for any of the potential successors
to be hoping, even quietly, that he
would retire before his time would
betray this community.
"We have a unique set of circum-
stances here," Clarenbach continues.
"We have a political environment that
gives a congressman the freedom to
maintain his principles, and speak out
against the military build-up and ag-
gressive foreign policies and violation
of civil liberties. Those are the
hallmark of Bob Kastenmeier. In good
conscience, I don't think anyone can
hope that he does anything but serve
as long as he cares to."
A member of Kastenmeier's
campaign steering committee,
Clarenbach has campaigned for the
congressman since his early years in
Washington. And Kastenmeier, 64,
who has represented the 2nd Congres-
sional District for 30 years, has not
expressed any interest in retiring. But
Clarenbach insists he doesn't mind.
"I'm more happy in the legisla-
ture than I've ever been," he says.
"There are still frustrations, but I think
my coping mechanism is much better
now. As I become a better legislator
and am more effective and therefore
see my work product incorporated
into the fabric of society, I think there's
a greater level of satisfaction in my
work."
Originally appeared in Isthmus. Reprinted with permission.
Paid for by the Clarenbach Committee, George Brown, Treasurer, 454 Sidney St., Madison
---
Dan
GayLife/Friday, May 15, 1981
A look at
MAY 26 RECU
Vol. 6, no. 47, PP. 114
homosexuality
and the Wisconsin law
By Louie Crew, Ph.D.
Each year approximately 86 persons
are arrested, 83 (96) prosecuted. and
71 (83) convicted of homosexual acts
under Wisconsin's general "sex of-
fenses" statute, according to projec-
tions based on the facts which this
researcher received from 51 (70.8%) of
the 72 county district attorneys in a poll
dated Aug. 18. 1980. (See Appendix
A.)
The current session of the Wisconsin
legislature is debating reform legisla-
tion (1981 Assembly Bill 235 and 1981
Senate Bill 205) which would legalize
such sexual activity between consent-
ing adults in private.
Since many of the acts leading to the
convictions reported by district attor-
neys under the old law would remain
criminal under the reform legislation
(e.g.. prostitution, sexual assault. stat-
utory rape, seduction and others), it is
impossible to estimate with any accu-
racy how many persons now prose-
cuted would be left alone if the new law
were to take effect. There is certainly no
documentation on record to show that
homosexual persons are more likely to
engage in criminal sexual activity
(except when consensual adult activity
is defined as criminal) than are hetero-
sexuals to engage in criminal hetero-
sexuality.
At present, however, the old law-
specifying, as it does, that "buggery"
and "sodomy or crime against nature"
are always felonious gives law en-
forcement persons the blanket permis-
sion to invade private domiciles to
arrest consenting adults engaged in any
homosexual intercourse.
Admittedly, some law enforcement
persons choose to ignore such "of-
fenses":
if you are asking about just homo-
sexual activities between consenting
adults, there are no arrests. prosecu
tions and or convictions
- Rodney A. Zemke. D.A.
Eau Claire County
Consensual acts involving adults have
not been reported to this office for
prosecution
-D.A.. Calumet County
To my knowledge no one in this period
(of 10 years] has been prosecuted for
any offense because he or she was
homosexual
-D.A.. Marquette County
I have been District Attorney since Jan
3 1977 Since that date there have
been no arrests or prosecutions for
consensual acts. not involving the giv-
ing of consideration, between homo-
sexual adults. In talking with members
of the office who predated me. there
have been no such prosecutions at
least since 1974
-James E. Doyle. Jr.. D.A.
Dane County
Still, presumably these four sample
counties have their usual quota of lesbi-
ans and gay men, and presumably they
are not all celibate. The effect of the
law, even when it is not enforced, is to
legitimize the stigma against them.
often to force them into an involuntary
kind of self-oppression, making them
live in constant fear of exposure and
reprisals.
The responses of several district
attorneys indicate that there is no uni-
form notion of what is meant by the
requested "homosexual offenses pro-
cessed under Wisconsin's General Sex
Offenses. "Some district attorneys
indicated that they did not list any of
the more general crimes of homosexu-
als involving non-consent or minors
(e.g.. "Figures do not include offenses
charged under 940.225 [sexual assault].
D.A.. Marinette County); yet other dis-
trict attorneys explicitly included them:
[One conviction in 1978] Fourth
Degree Sexual Assault. 940 225 (3m).
-D.A.. Iron County
I am also aware that he [my immediate
predecessor] filed an additional [1977]
com-plaint under 940 225 against a
father who had sexual contact with his
three small sons..
-Suzanne S. Havens. D.A.
Door County
Even though Havens went on to note
that "this case was not specifically
handled as homosexual conduct." she
did list it in her documentation of
"homosexual offenses." Thus, it is very
difficult to know how much credence to
give to the tallies collected from the
district attorneys, since each operated
with potentially a different assumption
of what "homosexual offenses" are.
There is evidence that district attor-
neys varying practice in classification
is matched by similar inconsistency in
their prosecution of homosexual
"offenses":
As I am sure you are aware such
offenses would have been prosecuted
under a wide variety of statutes includ-
ing, but not limited to, incest enticing a
child for immoral purposes. sexual
perversion, lewd and lascivious or dis-
orderly conduct Consequently, it is
impossible for us to determine the
number of homosexual offenses próse
cin this county for the time period in
question...
-Peter J Naze. D.A
Brown County
I am aware of no arrests of the type you
are interested in I have been around
for four years. so my knowledge is
somewhat limited. If there have been
such incidents before my time. I sus-
pect they may have been prosecuted
as disorderly conduct or battery and
not as sex offenses.
-Ed Fischer. D.A.
Washburn County
Many sexual perversions are charged
today as sexual assault Since we
average about three sexual assaults a
month you can figure about eight
more perversion cases (ie just under
ohe-fourth of all sexual assaults! per
year charged prosecuted. and con-
victed since 1976
-DA. Waukesha County
Francis J. Endejan. D.A. of Fond du
Lac, noted that that county's "statistics
are misleading because the persons
involved seldom wish to pursue
charges. A high incidence of this type of
behavior occurs in our prison
system...."
Much the most aggressive and
lengthy evaluation of homosexual
offenses was that by E. Michael
McCann. D.A. of Milwaukee County:
I will address myself to several areas
where homosexuals present them-
selves as particular problems The
order is not particularly in the order of
importance
(1) They present problems at various
business and nonprofit establishments
where they congregate and use the lay-
atories I don't know how they do it. but
in various lavatories where they gather
they punch two or three-inch circular
holes through the steel commode
separators. The one goes in and closes
the door and then waits for another to
enter the other commode The one
then thrusts his erect penis through the
hole in the commode wall and the
second person then proceeds to place
his mouth over that penis. Usually the
two individuals do not know one
another. Although the degree of ano-
nymity in this situation seems almost
incredible. it apparently is the pattern
sought by some homosexuals where
literally no face-to-face contact or
knowledge of one another by the two
actors exists. This pattern of anonym-
ity is apparently preferred by some or
many homosexuals. Typically a busi-
Inessman or the custodian. of a park.
gels complaints by the public that var-
ious nefarious achvities or proposals
are being made in these bathrooms In
some business establishments the
aggravation caused by such com-
plaints has reached such an extent that
the operators have actually removed
the doors of the commodes. hoping
that this exposure of the interior of the
commode will abate this homosexual
activity, One of the finest parks in the
city that enjoys a beautiful view of Lake
Michigan has become a place fre
quented by such individuals so muck
as to render the utility of the park for
others somewhat unpalatable In addi-i
tion to these public bathrooms, the
problem has also been occurring in so-
called adult bookstores where more
Ihan one will enter into a cubicle for the
showing of films and while one man
watches. the other will proceed to per-
form an act of fellatio on him:
(2) Contrary to the repeated protes-
tations of homosexuals. there is very
definitely a pattern of pursuil by older
homosexuals of younger homosexuals
known as "chicken "From my observa-
tions it appears that the older homo-
sexuals find some particularly attractive
attribute involved in these younger
persons Typically these younger per-
sons are not infants but are teenage
types under the age of 18 As a part of
this we on occasion have older men
paying young boys from 10 on up to
perform acts of fellatio on them
13) We have several bathhouses
operating here Although the police
know we will not initiate any action in
cases involving activities behind a
closed door in these facilities some
arrests occur from perversion activities
involving two male persons in semi-
public hallways or general saunas of
these establishments In one such case
a large number of men were standing
around a mat on the floor while two
men engaged in perversion activities I
would suppose there is some degree of
voyeurism involved in this type of
activity
(4) We do of course have the homo-
sexual assaults on occasion in our
lockups in the county
(5) Occasionally there is a homosex-
ual type of assault In one that I recol-
lect a man woke up in a boarding
house in his private room and found
another uninvited lodger sucking on
the first lodger's penis so hard that the
penis was bleeding At least several of
the homicides in our county are
believed to have been occasioned by
homosexual motivation
It is difficult at times to know who is
the voyeur here, or whether the details
would seem any less lurid if the plumb-
ing of the participants were identified
as heterosexual. McCann clearly
makes no effort to compare similar sta-
tistics on heterosexuals' offenses or of
their similar behavior in semi-private
places. Nor does he offer any help in
evaluating the extent to which the over-
all homosexual population is involved
in the behaviors which he found offen-
sive. Clearly he is interested only in
male homosexuality, because he, like
so many others, makes no reference to
lesbian behaviors at all.
***
The state itself gives very little help in
the matter. Wisconsin keeps no records
of arrests, prosecutions, and convic-
tions of sodomy and buggery, as it does
keep records for most other offenses
documented in the annual report of the
Department of Justice (Wisconsin
Criminal Justice Information, Crime
and Arrests)
Michael I. Zaleski, Assistant Attor-
ney General, notes: "Under Wisconsin
law, the district attorneys of the various
counties have the exclusive right to
prosecute criminal violations such as
this." We have seen already how ran-
domly and capriciously various district
attorneys interpret this responsibility.
Many others could not even keep up
with all of the cases of this sort (see
Appendix B). and still others did not
respond (see Appendix C), for wha-
tever reason.
Perhaps the widespread confusion
and the caprice which it appears to
sanction, as much as any other factors.
prompted the district attorneys of
seven counties to join the many other
individuals and groups requesting the
new legislation currently under consid-
eration in the legislature:
Bayfield County William D Bussey.
DA
Dane County James Doyle DA
Eau Claire County Rodney A Zemke.
DA
Green County- Robert S Duxtad
DA.
Marathon County- Rand L Krueger
D.A
Pierce County Michael M. Rajek
DA
Polk County John E Schneider DA
Similar legislation in 1980 passed the
Senate by a good margin. but was nar-
rowly defeated in the Assembly. Pros-
pects for the new effort are not clear.
-0-
Appendix A See page 14. OVER
Appendix B
The following counties reported but
said that they did not have the statistics
or could not supply the labor to locate
the statistics: Brown. Calumet. Dane.
Dodge. Douglas. Milwaukee. Outaga-
mie. Winnebago, and Wood. OvERY
---
Milwaukee Journal February 26, 1987
Jackamo
In search of state tax equity X On, Wisconsin
The Democrats who control the Legislature
commendably seem willing to join Republican Gov.
Dreyfus in a courageous step-raising taxes in an
election-year. Unfortunately, they appear unwill-
ing, for political reasons, to inject sufficient equity
into the specific plan the governor has proposed to
meet a huge budget deficit.
Dreyfus has called for what amounts to a perma-
nent 25% increase in the sales tax - from 4 cents
per dollar to 5 cents. As a remedy for an unexpect-
ed budget deficit resulting from a temporary na-
tionwide recession, the governor's approach is
simply too unfair - and the Democrats know it.
Yet they balk at scrapping the sales-tax boost
and substituting a far more equitable income-tax
surcharge. Apparently they fear that would brand
the tax boost as Democratic, rather than Republi-
can, and risk voter retaliation next fall. In short,
political expediency is winning over the tax equity
that these Democrats usually espouse.
The advantages of an income-tax surcharge are
clear. It could easily be made temporary, and be-
cause Wisconsin's income tax rates are pegged to
citizens' ability to pay, a surcharge would take the
needed new revenue from the taxpayers most able
to afford it. In contrast, Dreyfus' permanent sales-
tax boost would sock everyone who buys taxed
items- most harshly the poor and the unem-
ployed victims of recession.
At the very least, the legislators should tilt the
tax-increase package somewhat more toward abili-
ty-to-pay by supplementing the sales-tax increase
with an income surcharge. That would raise
enough additional revenue to close the budget gap
without the unwarranted pay-freeze and program-
cut features urged by Dreyfus.
In one regard, some lawmakers in both parties
are trying to improve the Dreyfus plan. The gover-
nor proposes that the sales tax revenue be returned
to localities after July 1, 1983, when the state
budget presumably will have been balanced. The
lawmakers fear that his plan would turn the clock
back more than a decade to the "tax island" era
when revenue was unfairly returned to the locall-
ties where it was raised, without regard to need.
The rich got richer. Billing his plan as property-tax
relief, Dreyfus has given it a popular twist, but
there is no essential connection between the tax
revenue's county of origin and the locations of
greatest need for property-tax relief.
Those legislative critics of Dreyfus' proposal
make some valid points that we had not considered
when last fall we backed a sales tax to help fi-
nance water pollution abatement. So, if a perma-
nent sales-tax boost is to be imposed statewide in
the midst of a recession, the revenue should be dis-
tributed to localities through some formula that
reflects relative need for it-whether the funds
are to be used for general property-tax relief or for
pollution abatement.
A sensible "need" formula would still assure
help for Milwaukee County residents facing big
property-tax bills for sewerage. But, equally im-
portant, the formula would build more equity
statewide into the Dreyfus plan.
Dreyfus favors IRA deduction
Journal Madison Bureau
Madison, Wis. Gov. Dreyfus
said Thursday that he still regarded a
state income tax deduction for indi-
vidual retirement accounts as a desir-
able goal for his administration.
But, he said at his weekly news
conference, it was not possible to
propose the deduction in the budget
adjustment bill last week because it
would have been too costly at the
time.
The governor said he had been
criticized for failing to follow the
federal system, which provides an
exemption on the first $2,000 depos-
ited in the accounts.
Dreyfus also said his series of
town meetings around the state next
week would not be political and thus
I would not be underwritten by the
State Republican Party.
Dreyfus, accompanied by cabinet
officers, will confine the content of
his appearances to his proposal to
increase the state sales tax to 5%.
The money generated by the increase
would be used by the state until mid-
1983 to help balance the budget and
then would be kept by counties for
property tax relief, he said.
-
later
Dreyfus also said he rejected a
budget-balancing idea from a profes-
sor who suggested enactment of a
tax surcharge on all people in the
state who earn more than $30,000 a
year.
Dreyfus has proposed a one-year
moratorium on raises for state em-
ployes who earn more than $30,000.
Donald Nichols, an economics pro-
fessor at the University of Wisconsin
-Madison, had said in letters to leg-
islators that the governor was pick-
ing on civil servants and should im-
pose a surcharge on all residents in
the $30,000 category instead.
Nursing home Medicaid cost set
Journal Madison Bureau
Madison, Wis. The cost of serving
Wisconsin nursing homes' Medicaid resi-
dents would be about $670 million in
1982, under a plan approved Thursday by
a subcommittee of the Legislature's Joint
Finance Committee.
Of that amount, about $233 million
would be state funds, with the remainder
paid by the federal government and pri-
vate patient funds.
Nursing homes represent the largest
single part of the total Medicaid program.
The subcommittee revised the original
proposal of the State Health and Social
Services Department for reimbursing
nursing homes.
The department had proposed to guar-
antee the 1981 rate as a base and increase
payments to home on a sliding scale,
from 0% to 7%, with the most economi-
cal homes receiving the highest percent-
age increase.
-
An Editorial
New 'gay rights' law
sadly necessary
Should homosexuals have le-
gal protection against discrimi-
nation? Gov. Dreyfus and the
State Legislature deserve praise
for courageously confronting
that socially explosive question
and answering "yes." Dreyfus
has signed into law a bill that
prohibits discrimination against
homosexuals in employment,
housing and public accommoda-
tions.
The law is likely to provoke
controversy, as the governor
noted. People who would not
countenance discrimination on
the grounds of race, sex, reli-
gion, age or national origin often
cannot find tolerance for homo-
sexuals. Many people feel that to
outlaw bias against homosexuals
is, in some way, to condone or
promote the gay lifestyle.
However, the issue is not
homosexuality. The issue is an
unpardonable form of discrimi-
nation.
As Dreyfus put it, the new law
offers protection of the right to
privacy in one's sexual prefer-
ence, and helps keep government
involvement in private lives
"very restricted." By banning
job and housing discrimination,
the law places an "additional
limitation on one more area of
governmentally sanctioned in-
quiry into an individual's
thoughts, beliefs and feelings,"
Dreyfus said.
Yet, the law does not injure
the protections that rightly are
provided against criminal or as-
saultive sexual conduct. More-
over, the new law does not es-
tablish "gay quotas" for employ-
ers. It does not sanction expres-
sion of sexual preferences in
classrooms.
Dreyfus and the lawmakers
can be proud that Wisconsin
now forbids sexual-preference
discrimination, as it has forbid-
den other forms of bias. What is
regrettable is that intolerance
made the law necessary.
A
The subcommittee, however, proposed
increases on a scale from 4.75% to 7.5%.
The subcommittee's proposal will
sent to the full committee Tuesday.
The full committee's recommendations
must be reviewed by Gov. Dreyfus, whoq
could veto them. His veto could be overr
ridden by 10 of the 14 members of the
committee.
Sewage grants could bolster building trades
Journal Madison Bureau
Madison, Wis. - Wisconsin building
trades should get an economic boost from
$91 million in Wisconsin Fund grants for
construction of sewage treatment, Natu-
ral Resources Secretary Carroll Besadny
said this week in reporting 1981 funds
now being made available.
Projects in 76 communities were listed,
including $35.8 million for the Milwau-
kee Metropolitan Sewerage District and
$4.2 million for the City of Milwaukee.
"This money will go a long way in our
water pollution control efforts," Besadny
said. "But just as important, it will pump
dollars into the state's economy and
hundreds of jobs in the hard pressed con-
struction industry."
He said the grants would generate
more than $160 million in new, construc-
tion calling for heavy equipment opera-
tors, cement finishers, carpenters, sheet
metal workers and other trades. These
trades have been experiencing up to 10%
unemployment.
In its first two years the Wisconsin
Fund clean water program awarded $150
million in construction grants. It will
make final 1981 awards after reviewing
construction bids for the projects listed.
C
(OVER)
---
1
Y
15
Bill on Crime Reform Clears
Senate Judiciary Committee
By STUART TAYLOR Jr.
Special to The New York Times
WASHINGTON, Nov. 18 The 15-
year-old effort to overhaul the Federal
Criminal Code once again cleared the
Senate Judiciary Committee today, in
the form of a 425-page "consensus" bill
with seemingly inexhaustible potential
for sowing disagreement.
Gathered in a cramped, smoked-filled
room in the Capitol this afternoon, the
Senators approved the bill by a vote of 11
to 5 after adopting a series of amend-
ments designed to appease the funda-
mentalist group Moral Majority and
after a debate that focused on sex
crimes.
Senator Jeremiah Denton, Republi-
can of Alabama, sought to eliminate a
code provision that would make it a
crime for a man to rape his wife. Moral
Majority also opposed the code provi-
sion, but the Senator's attempted
amendment was rejected by a vote of 5
to 3. The Senator stated that, while he
believed marital rape was "a hideous
crime," he opposed including it in the
omnibus bill.
In response to a complaint from Moral
Majority that the bill's maximum pen-
alty for rape was too lenient, the com-
mittee voted to increase it to 25 years,
from 12 years. But Dr. Ronald S. God-
win, vice president of Moral Majority,
said today this was still not enough, op-
posing the whole bill as "soft on crime."
Strange Coalition of Support
The criminal code reform bill, a bi-
partisan effort designed to bring consis-
tency and order to the chaotic and con-
fusing hodgepodge of Federal criminal
laws that has grown up over the years,
has produced some strange allies, and
an unusual collection of opponents.
The chairman of the Senate Judiciary
Committee, Strom Thurmond, Republi-
can of South Carolina, and other conser-
vatives have joined with Senator Ed-
ward M. Kennedy, Democrat of Massa-
chusetts, and other liberals in sponsor-
ing the measure.
Its opponents include not only conser-
vative groups like Moral Majority,
I which are angry at Senator Thurmond,
their usual ally, but also the American
Civil Liberties Union, which is angry at
Senator Kennedy, one of the Senate's
leading liberals.
While the religious activist group
Moral Majority complains that the bill
is too soft on street crime and too hard
on corporations accused of crimes, as
well as husbands accused of marital
rape, the civil liberties union said in a
letter Tuesday that the bill should be de-
feated because of "serious incursions on
civil liberties."
Senator Thurmond and other sponsors
of criminal code reform, including the
Reagan Administration, have tried to
keep provisions involving the most con-
troversial criminal justice issues out of
the bill. These controversies include the
death penalty, gun control and efforts to
allow use of illegally seized evidence.
Outlook on Enactment
Their efforts to reach "consensus"
to efforts to solve the immediate prob-
have made the bill somewhat peripheral
lem of street crime. But the bill may be
debated at length on the Senate floor
and ultimate enactment still seems the
elusive goal it has proven to be in the
past.
the bill would make in the law are its
Among the most important changes
provisions on sentencing and bail. The
the maximum prison sentences for most
sentencing provisions would increase
crimes by limiting the power of judges
parole system, and other measures to
to use probation, abolishing the Federal
make sentencing more uniform and cer-
tain.
The bail provisions would authorize
judges to jail defendants whom they
consider dangerous before they have
been tried or convicted. Under current
law, judges must release defendants be-
fore trial unless they seem unlikely to
appear for trial.
John Shattuck, head of the civil liber-
ties union's Washington office, said
after the committee action that "the
preventive detention provision would
violate the presumption of innocence"
and the sentencing provisions would
"lock more people up for longer periods
of time at a time when prison over-
crowding is severe."
But these provisions have the support
of many liberals as well as conserva-
tives, and seem likely to be passed by
the Senate. The prospects for criminal
code reform in the House are much less
favorable.
---
28 THE CAPITAL TIMES, Friday, Dec. 7, 1979
Amend 1964 bill
Prox supports gay
job-rights proposal
By STEPHEN M. JOHNSON
C-T Washington Correspondent
WASHINGTON
-
Sen. William
Proxmire, D-Wis., has expressed his
strong support for legislation intro-
duced in the Senate this week which
would prohibit job discrimination
against homosexuals.
The legislation, sponsored by Sen.
Paul Tsongas, D-Mass., would amend
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964 to include the phrase "sexual ori-
entation." It would provide legal re-
course for those persons who are
fired or denied jobs because of their
sexual preferences.
Sen. Gaylord Nelson, D-Wis., says
he has not yet decided whether to sup-
port the measure.
The 1964 Civil Rights Act already
bans job discrimination based on
race, sex, religion, creed or national
origin. Backers of the Tsongas bill
argue that as a matter of consistency
and simple justice, job discrimination
based on sexual preference should be
banned as well.
In introducing the bill, Tsongas sub-
mitted for the record letters from a
number of major American corpora-
tions pledging their support for equal
job opportunities for gays.
Tsongas also presented evidence
from the American Psychiatric Asso-
ciation, the National Council of
Churches and the National Institute
of Mental Health supporting legisla-
tion in this area.
According to the National Institute
of Mental Health, "Full equality for
homosexuals will not be achieved by
changes in the law alone, but such
changes may help to facilitate the re-
casting of public attitudes that is
needed."
In a speech on the Senate floor on
Wednesday, Tsongas said:
"The issue is simple. Every Ameri-
can must have an equal right to a job
based on his or her ability. Sexual ori-
entation is essentially a private mat-
ter that should have nothing to do
with job performance.
"This legislation is consistent with
strong public disapproval of govern-
ment intrusion in the private lives of
Americans. Despite the issue's sensi-
tivity, it is fundamentally a matter of
equal rights under the law," Tsongas
said.
Joining Tsongas in sponsoring the
legislation were Sens. Daniel Patrick
Moynihan, D-N.Y., and Lowell P.
Weicker, R-Conn.
Moynihan said he could see "no rea-
son why gay men and women should
be treated differently from anyone
else. Guarantees against employment
discrimination accorded other citi-
zens should protect homosexuals and
bisexuals as well."
Weicker acknowledged that some
people would ask, "Is this legislation
necessary?"
"Well, I wish it were not neces-
sary," the Connecticut Republican
said. "But it is. Like anything else
where a minority is involved, it takes
a prod. And that prod is the law, spe-
cifically, the Civil Rights Act.
"I do not think that we are going to
address ourselves to the problem or
even approach the solution to the
problem unless there is a law on the
books."
A spokesman for Proxmire said the
senator has always supported equal
rights for women, minorities and
other disadvantaged groups in soci-
ety, and saw no reason why homosex-
uais should be an exception.
He said Proxmire would join
Weicker and Moynihan in co-sponsor-
ing the legislation if asked.
---
February 19, 1982 Vol. 13, No. 4 Two Sections
50¢ OUTSIDE OF D.C./BALTIMORE AREAS
The
-THE GAY NEWSPAPER OF THE NATION'S CAPITAL
Washington Blade
Wisconsin
Senate
backs Gay
rights
by Steve Martz
In an historic move, the Wisconsin
State Senate approved a state Gay rights
bill by voice vote on February 16.
The action, without precedent in
American political history, moves Wis-
consin to the brink of becoming the first
state to ban discrimination based on sex-
ual orientation.
The bill now goes to the desk of Gov.
Lee Dreyfus, a maverick Republican,
who is expected either to sign it or, at the
very least, to let it pass into law without
his signature.
The unrecorded voice vote came after
the Senate defeated a motion of non-
concurrence put forth by Republican
Sen. David Opitz. The motion was
defeated by a 19-13 vote.
The legislation, in the form of amend-
ments adding sexual orientation to the
lists of protected categories in existing
state civil rights laws, is broad in scope.
It provides protection for state residents
against discrimination in housing, public
accommodations, and employment.
In addition, the legislation requires all
companies with state contracts to abide
by its provisions, even if the companies
are based in another state. The bill also
bans bias by state agencies in the promul-
gation of administrative rules and by the
state's National Guard in the conduct of
its affairs.
The Senate action comes less than four
months after the bill's chief sponsor and
architect, State Rep. David Clarenbach
of Madison, steered the bill through the
Continued on page A-10
---
A-10 THE WASHINGTON BLADE
-
· February 19, 1982
Wisconsin moves to the brink
Continued from page A-1
State Assembly by a vote of 50-46.
At that time, Clarenbach said the bill
has "cleared the major hurdle" and
pre-
dicted it would pass the Senate and be
signed by the governor. Clarenbach
remains certain the bill will become law,
I said staff assistant Dan Curd. He added
that every formal and informal indication
Clarenbach and other supporters of the
bill have received from Gov. Dreyfus'
staff indicates the governor will sign it.
An aide to Dreyfus confirmed that
likelihood. "I don't believe there are any
remaining concerns" that would prevent
the governor from signing the legislation,
said Margaret Lewis, a legislative liaison
for the governor.
Dreyfus had been mildly critical of the
bill at one point because he felt it might
be read to require affirmative action for
homosexuals. Other than that concern,
he has no qualms about the bill, he has
told both reporters and religious leaders
backing the legislation.
After Dreyfus voiced his concern, sup-
porters of the bill decided to add an affir-
mative action disclaimer to the bill. The
amendment was added in the Senate
before the February 16 vote and was
approved separately by the House on
February 18.
Backers of the bill assembled a broad
coalition of supporters, stressing that the
issue was one of civil rights, not morality.
A key factor in the success of that argu-
ment was the wide support the legisla-
tion received from the state's religious
community. According to Clarenbach,
the bill's supporters included the Roman
Catholic Archdiocese of Milwaukee and
statewide church bodies representing
Methodists, Lutherans, Unitarians,
Episcopalians, Presbyterians, and Ameri-
can Baptists.
The action in Wisconsin is the second
major victory for Gay rights during the
first two months of 1982. On January 16,
voters in Austin, Texas overwhelmingly
rejected an initiative that would have
allowed housing discrimination against
homosexuals.
If Clarenbach's bill clears its final hur-
dle, as expected, Wisconsin will become
the fourth state to offer some form of
protection against discrimination to its
Gay citizens. In three other states
California, Michigan, and Pennsylvania
-
governors have issued executive
orders barring discrimination by state
government. None of these actions, how-
ever, is as far reaching as the Wisconsin
legislation.
---
F. Gay
Right
8 THE CAPITAL TIMES, Friday, May 22, 1981 •
Koop perfect for science fiction; not the country
How's this for a truly unusual vision
of America's future:
It's about 20 years from now. Amer-
ica's homosexuals want more political
power. But to get this power, they ob-
viously need more gay voters.
So they turn to science to achieve
their goals. They begin breeding test-
tube babies.
As the babies grow up, the gays
raise them to be gay. And within a
couple of generations, we have mil-
lions and millions of test-tube gays
reaching voting age. And they be-
come a powerful political force.
Imagine that. Why, this country
could wind up with a former male
hairdresser as president. And the na-
tion's first lady could be a guy named
Max.
Now, this is not just a strange pipe
dream. Wait, I take that back. It is a
strange pipe dream, but it wasn't
hatched at some saloon bar or in a
cloud of marijuana smoke.
This particular pipe dream origi-
nates with Dr. C. Everett Koop, who
is President Reagan's choice for the
post of United States surgeon general,
this country's top public health job, al-
though he has not yet been named to
the post.
And this isn't Dr. Koop's only unu-
sual vision of the future. He has many
of them, apparently based on a deep,
conservative suspicion of scientific
and social change. He could probably
keep a science fiction horror writer in
scary plots for years. Except Dr.
Koop isn't kidding.
I can't share Dr. Koop's fear of a
homosexual takeover of this country
through test-tube babies.
For one thing, it would take an
awful lot of babies before there were
enough to make a political impact.
Would they be raising them like pot-
ted plants? Hundreds and hundreds of
test tubes lined up in each gay's taste-
Mike
Royko
Chicago Sun-Times
News Service
fully decorated apartment?
And when they started sprouting, or
whatever it is that test-tube babies
would do in Dr. Koop's vision, what a
terrible din we would hear in places
like San Francisco and Chicago's New
Town neighborhood. Tens of thou-
sands, hundreds of thousands, maybe
millions of these little potentially gay
infants wah-wahing because they
need their diapers changed, they need
burping, or they're hungry.
Based on my own experience as a
father, I don't think Dr. Koop has any-
thing to worry about.
For one thing, it is hard enough
catching the 1 a.m. feeding of just one
baby, especially if you have to get up
in the morning and go to work.
But it would be an overwhelming
job to have to get up at 1 a.m. and pre-
pare bottles for 20 or 30 or 100 of them
and get the temperature just right.
And then the harried gay would have
to feed them all. After feeding them,
he would have to pick each of them up
to burp them, which can be the hard-
est part.
As anyone who has ever burped
kids knows, about half the time they
throw up on you. It's bad enough hav-
ing one baby throw up on you, but it
would be unnerving to have 50 or 60 of
them do it.
Then you have to change their diap-
ers.
I really doubt that political power
would be worth having 50 or 60 babies
throwing up on you every night.
So instead of having a gay political
takeover of this country, what would
probably happen would be that we
would have a nationwide outbreak of
nervous breakdowns by bad-smelling
gays.
As I said, Dr. Koop has many unu-
sual ideas about our future. Many of
them, according to the Washington
Post, were revealed in a speech he
made to a medical group a couple of
years ago, and in articles he has writ-
ten.
For one thing, he is against abor-
tion. That in itself is not unusual. But
Dr. Koop believes legalized abortion
will lead to parents having the legal
right to kill a baby up to three days
after it is born. They would do this for
such reasons as having hoped for a
boy, but having a girl instead. So they
would just zap the girl baby.
And abortion, he has said, will lead
to voluntary euthanasia of people who
are old or sick or senile. And this, he
said, will lead to the government
eventually deciding which of the old
or sick or senile will be knocked off.
You would think that somebody
who has such nightmarish visions of
where abortion will lead us would be
in favor of some kind of birth control,
so that we won't have parents having
their children bumped off, or such a
surplus of old people that society
would kill them.
But Dr. Koop is also a severe critic
of Planned Parenthood, which be-
lieves in birth control as a means of
avoiding overpopulation and having
unwanted children.
He believes Planned Parenthood is
a terrible organization that has done
nothing but encourage teen-agers to
have sex. (Does he really believe that.
teen-agers never did that before
Planned Parenthood came along?)
He must have grown up with kids who
took cold showers every two hours.)
He's probably correct that more
teen-agers engage in sex today than
they did before the advent of modern
birth control devices.
But his answer to teen-age sex is
not to educate them on how to avoid
pregnancy. Instead, he believes they
should be taught to abstain.
Considering that we are barely able
to teach teen-agers in this country
how to read and write, it would be one
heckuva educational challenge to
teach them to resist the urge to get in
the back seat of that car and grapple.
And it seems unfair to blame
Planned Parenthood for teen-age sex.
If Planned Parenthood was really
that effective in telling teen-agers
how to have sex without pregnancy,
we wouldn't be setting new national
records every year for illegimate
babies by teen-age mothers.
I don't know if Dr. Koop is going to
get the job of surgeon general. Some
congressmen think his views are
more than a little strange and they
point out that he has had little public
health experience and is already past
the legal age limit for the post.
But worse things could happen.
What if Reagan decided he wanted
the imaginative Koop to be secretary
of defense?
Then Koop might go on TV and
shout: "Godzilla is coming!"
---
TAKE OVER PAGE 13
Dec 1977
file: gay rights
They Shall Beat Their Children
Into Plowshares...
"You will stand naked before the
Lord on Judgement day, and on that
day God will judge you on how you
voted on nude dancing in this sinful
city."
"Amen," rang out the chorus from
the packed City Council Chambers.
"God said, and I believe it. And
that settles it," cried that child of the
Lord who came to the seat of govern-
ment in Madison to convert all those
sinners from the Dangle Lounge. He
turned to his enemy, bible in hand,
and spoke, "Whether you believe it or
not, doesn't matter. The Lord says that
nudity is sinful, and you must open your
heart to the Lord."
"Praise the Lord, Hallelu in," added
the chorus.
No this wasn't a revival meeting It
was a hearing of the City Council on
the proposed tightening of the nude danc-
ing laws in Madison. The bible toting
Baptists were out over 200 strong. But
quietly sitting in the back were the power
houses and architects of this coalition
of the political right and the almighty,
not that they weren't married in
heaven centuries ago.
Back to the crew-cut, square jawed,
fair-haired (they with a few stray Blacks
from the Pentecostal Gospel Church
thrown in to improve the complexion),
preachers.
Yes, there was not a soul that Tues-
day night who didn't try to shake the
tiles in the ceiling lose to scare those
heathen council members. We heard e-
verything from the ex-hippie who was
"possessed by the devil, using every
drug you could think, and having some
god-awful heavy sex, until the Lord Je-
sus came into my life-Praise the Lord-
and showed me the light, 'to the sermon
on the mount message to the masses.
The show went on for hours, and as
the 'millenium came at 1:30 a.m. the
council called it quits for another week,
the Christians got stronger and stronger
as if they were facing the lions in the
They in Rome
had come to spread the fear of
god in Sodom, but they left wishing
the fire and brimstone would hit that
very night.
The real target of this Crusade was
Paul Soglin. But, being the only smart
politician up there, he was in the Holy
Land when the Baptists came to string
him up.
The Northport Baptist Church and its
Reverend Wayne Dillabaugh are no
strangers to the political arena. They
were very much in the forefront of the
Amato campaign, having the dubious
distinction of having more green Amato
signs on their lawn than any place in
the city. They hadthemplastered to the
trees and up and down the block, where
many of the sheep in Pastor Wayne's
flock live. All those nice little kids that
are so fond of discipline wore big green
Amato buttons as big as their faces, and
leafleted the neighborhood regularly for
old Nino. Rev. Dillabaugh believes in
getting them broken in early. He also
believes in busing, that is busing of
his school children to the West side of
town, where all those sinners live to
leaflet for causes like Nino. But Wayne
Dillabaugh is not a one man or one
issue fellow.
His latest exercise seems to be child
beating. He's subject of a well publi-
cized John Doe investigation by D.A.
James Doyle, Jr. for spanking one of
his students. The young boy was pad-
dled long enough to give him bruises
and contusions forcing his devout par-
ents to take their trust away from the
Lord just a bit and see a doctor. The
doctor notified the police.
Rev. Dillabaugh is a proud man.
All you have to do is check the Yellow
Pages to see that. He has the largest ad
for any church in the City. But the Rev.
is not beneath hiding behind the skirt
of an 18 year old teacher in his school,
who was the only witness to the inci-
den the name of religious freedom and
a "greater duty to God", Kathryn Brandt
refused to testify before the John Doe,
being conducted by Judge Moria Krue
ger. She and the Northport Baptist
Church hired one of Madison's most
famous sinners, Jack McManus to de-
fend her against those who wanted her
hide or her testimony. McManus put on
quite a show for his $5,000 fee at the
contempt hearing beofre Judge Krueger,
just one day after the Council hearing.
The Reverand Wayne Dildo and his devoted flock
N.B.C.; THE ALMIGHTY RIGHT RISES AGAIN
The incongruity of Jack McManus,
assisted by Curtis Kirkhuff. defending
the feathered hair cherubic young tea-
cher was apparent from the bang of
the gavel. Judge Krueger proclaimed
she was merely after the truth. M cManus
shot back that he was a soldier of God's
truth-the ultimate truth. In the end,
if the actual sentence really means any-
thing the court meted out a punishment
against God's truth, but the good Chris-
tian soldiers are getting great propa-
ganda out of it.
Imagine that infamous drunken,
womanizing braggart Jack McManus,
defender of rapists and pimps,
claiming Madison to be a "lewd, ob-
scene, vulgar and godless city."
pro-
A chorus of "Amens" came from the
packed court room.
McManus went on to declare Kathy
Brandt a "modern day Joan of Arc".
Refusing to allow her to answer any
questions, Jack stated, "She will not pay
tribute to this witchhunt, her greater
duty lies with her god." Again Amen.
Jack was having a tough time with
his genders in referring to the court,
attempting to apologize constantly for
being disrespectful. He tried to get Moria
to agree to letting Kathy sit with her
bible in her chambers for an hour as
punishment for her contempt. A more
fitting punishment would have been to
write "I believe in God" 500 times on the
blackboard.
Upon sentencing Judge Kreuger had
some bible reading of her own. She cit-
ed a chapter from the New Testament.
and immediately dozens of little black
cloth books sprung forth to interpret
the Judge's remarks.
Outside the courthouse a troop of NBC
jungen were marched around and
around chanting "Discipline is Love".
City Finance Minister Andre Blum com-
mented on his way past the troopers,
"Somebody should beat the shit out of
the little bastards."
The question everyone seems to be
asking is where did they come from?
Like the rest of the right-wing Christian
resurgence taking place in the country,
Madison is just beginning to get into the
act. They've been out there on the North-
east of town for years purifying and disci-
plining their souls in the baptismal,
waiting for someone to take them
downtown on a crusade. It started with
matically despite his crushing defeat.
the Amato campaign, but has grown dra-
They have God on their side.
The people who have marshaled their
forces are the same people who have
been forging right-wing colaitions in
Madison for decades. The principles are
all familiar names; Carroll Metzner, Fe-
lix Kremer, Dr. Fosmark, Rev. Pritch-
ard, and the like. The sex issue seems
to be the work mainly of the prissy
wives of Rev. Pritchard and Carroll
Metzner, who are the best of cronies.
They are not really interested in the
sex issue or Madison's morality, their
main concern is forging a New Right
coalition that can elect someone into
office. With Soglin out of the way, for
the time being Metzner has announced
his prime targets to be Alderman John
Mattes and Assemblyman David Claren-
bach. Metzner sat through over 4 hours
of bible preaching to get his chance at
blasting Mattes on the Council floor.
Julie Maynard must be filling his ear
with horror stories, tales about John's
"radical past".
I'M
FOR
MRC
Why Clarenbach? The answeris all
-too obvious. As an avowed gay legis-
lator, David represents the next target
of the Baptist bunch. Yes folks, Anita
Bryant is coming to Madison in the form
of a short, fat, male blonde-Pastor
Wayne Dillabaugh. They are timing their
campaign with the planned opening of
the Gay Baths on State Street (where
Good Karma) used to be.
Prepare yourselves sinners, for the
Lord Jesus and his crazed followers are
marching into town. You have no place
to hide before God. Repent!
OR FIGHT BACK!
Kathryn Brandt and her god-fearing Attorney, Jack McManus.
---
30 cents
Vol. 1, No. 3
MAR 9 1982
Wisconsin Property
Owners' News
Published weekly by Wisconsin Property Owners' Association
Everything for and from the property owner's view and interest.
Our Purpose: To inform Wisconsin property owners of actions in and around the state affecting private property.
P.O. Box 91 Mount Horeb, WI 53572
Bill Hitzemann, Director
Property tax revolt
hits Vernon County
A property tax revolt has begun in
Vernon County, where property taxes
have increased by more than 32% this
year. A group calling itself "Grass-
roots for United Progress (GROUP),'
and led by Viroqua farmer Jack
Deters has already swung into action.
The sixty members of GROUP are
withholding 30% of their property
taxes until Vernon County comes up
with a roll-back in property taxes.
Some persons are withholding more
than that.
"They won't quit spending, so we
will quit giving," declared Mr.
Deters to the PROPERTY OWNER'S
NEWS. Deters, who owns a 100 acre
farm in Viroqua, says that his property
OFF-Budget wizardry
hides $41 billion debt
by Don Bell
It is called the Federal Financing
Bank, or FFB, and it started from
scratch in 1974. This summer it shot
past Citibank N.A. ($106.1 billion in
assets) and next year (1983) it will
probably overtake the biggest of them
all, Bank of America ($115.7 billion).
But whereas Citibank has 22,000 em-
ployes and Bank of America has
76,000, the FFB has just seven
full-time employes. The success story
of this bank, which was intended to
streamline the federal government's
borrowing, is based on several attri-
butes unique in the world of banking:
The FFB borrows money from the
Treasury at the Treasury's bargain
rates and lends the funds to federal
agencies and to all users of federally
guaranteed loans, including busi-
nesses, foreign governments and rural
electric cooperatives, at only one-
eighth of an interest point higher.
It is guided in the financial markets
by the very brains that run the
Treasury itself. For example, Francis
X. Cavanaugh, the Treasury's director
of government financing, is acting
secretary of the FFB.
• Through a variety of arcane pro-
cedures, the FFB can be used to
"hide" federal debt that would other-
wise appear in the federal budget.
This aspect of the FFB has attracted a
'continued on page 5
FLASH!!
The controversial
Wetlands Bill is
tentatively on
the Assembly Calendar
for Wed., March 10, 1982
tax bill was $4,400 in 1981. "That's
$50 a week," he said.
When asked if he feared any legal
repercussions for this unusual action,
Deters felt that they would be safe if
enough persons in the area joined the
action.
Deters said that farmers are
especially hard hit by property taxes
because the occupation requires a
massive investment in property for
only a minimal return in income. Other
occupations often require little or no
investment in property to achieve the
same income, yet county services are
shared equally by all residents.
Deters also felt that property
assessments on farms should be based
on productivity, rather than market
value. "The ability to pay corresponds
much better with the income tax," he
said.
He hopes to have an immediate
impact locally by setting up commit-
tees to work with school boards in
keeping educational costs down.
"We may have to go statewide," he
mused, while looking towards the
future. Deters and his organization
ultimately want a tax-limitation
amendment inserted into the Wiscon-
sin Constitution similar to California's
Proposition 13 to put ceilings on
property tax increases.
BULK RATE
U.S. POSTAGE
-PAID
Permit No. 63
Mt. Horeb, WI
March 10, 1982
Bill limits DNR
land purchases
Senator Richard Kreul (R-Fenni-
more) is sponsoring a bill to put a
three-year moratorium on land pur-
chases by the Department of Natural
Resources.
The DNR has, meanwhile, an-
nounced that it has reached the half-
way point on its planned purchases of
private property, even while other
agencies are trying to find ways to cut
expenditures.
Senator Kreul feels the bill is
necessary because private property
purchased by government no longer
pays property taxes.
The WPOA favors this bill. With all
of the land-control bills now trying to
give the DNR control over private
property without purchasing it, we
wonder why they even feel it is neces-
sary to go through the expense.
"Privacy" phony issue
in sellout to gays
Governor Dreyfus has signed into law
a bill prohibiting discrimination
against homosexuals in housing, em-
ployment, and public accommoda-
tions.
The measure forces landlords and
businessmen to adhere to a state
mandated code of non-morality when
deciding on whom they shall rent their
property or employ in their private
businesses.
Governor Dreyfus proclaimed the
bill as a significant advancement
towards the right of privacy for
citizens.
The WPOA begs to differ.
A family may rent a room in their
home to gain extra income. An avowed
homosexual shows up wanting to rent,
and he may also be wearing one of the
garish outfits that homosexuals some-
times wear. By law, the family must
bring this man into the privacy of their
home and rent the room to him.
Where are the property owner's
rights of privacy? Where are their
property rights? Why are they not
allowed to at least uphold a code of
morality within the confines of their
own homes? Virtually all religions
oppose homosexual practices, so why
have their religious rights been
violated?
The word "privacy" does not even
appear in the US Constitution. There is
no specific "right of privacy," al-
though the ninth amendment does say
that just because a right is not
mentioned in the constitution, that in
itself should not be interpreted as the
right not being there.
Thus, at best the constitution does
not prohibit the right of privacy.
Conversely, the right of private
Property was given a key billing by our
forefathers as our third most important
by James Delp
right, after only "life" and "liberty."
The property rights were later ex-
ited the quartering of troops in private
panded by amendments that prohib-
homes, searching private property
taking property without just compen-
without a warrant or probable cause,
sation, and taking property without
due process.
Even if the gay rights bill did
expand the right of privacy, there is no
question that property rights are far
superior.
What really happened in Madison
last week was that the liberal clique
running the legislature cherishes
degree that they have outdone them-
tolerance of immorality to such a
selves, and in so doing they have.
replaced tolerance with preference.
---
RENAISSANCE NEWSLETTER
box 687
madison, wi
53701
gay
july/aug./sept., 1976
editor: j.m. lindert.
CLARENBACH
SEEKING
REELECTION
GAY
RADIO
PROGRAM
State Representative David.
Clarenbach, one of the Wiscon-
sin Legislature's few vocal
advocates for gay rights, is
seeking reelection to the state
assembly from the 78th district,
Fadison's central and near east
side. Clarenbach, 22 and a
Democrat, faces stiff primary
opposition in the September 14th
primary.
During the 1975-76 session
of the legislature, David authored
a number of bills and amendments
aimed at eliminating discrim-
ination based on sexual preference.
Clarenbach offered legislation
which would legalize private
sexual activity between consent-
ing adults as well as measures
to protect gay people from dis-
crimination in housing and pub-
lic accomodations.
"The state has a major role
to play in breaking down the
societal barriers which con-
front gays on a daily basis"
Clarenbach said. "I will
continue to remind my colleagues.
in the Legislature of the re-
sponsibility by introducing and
actively supporting the passage
of cay rights legislation."
continued on page 2
A proposal for 30 minute
weekly radio program has
been approved by WCRT-F.,
"Back Porch" Radio, 89.7 on
the dial, will return to the
air on August 15, and within
six weeks, Madison's first
gay program should be on the
air. The intervening time
will be spent training mem-
bers of the radio group in
engineering and production
techniques, and in finding
an acceptable time slot for
both the station and the gay
radio group.
There is still a need for
wider participation, espec-
ially women.
All interested
people should contact John
Young at 256-2479.
The gay radio show will
feature a variety of gay in-
terests: gay and feminist
music, gay news, book and
record reviews, interviews
of local gay interest, and
public service announcements
of interest to gay people.
The group also plans to do
special programs on major
topics like alcohol and
drug abuse, venereal dis-
continued on page 3
---
-2-
continued from page 1
Clarenbach has also been in-
volved in a number of other
civil rights issues dealing with
the rights of women, tenants,
students and prisoners. Ex-
tremely active in the area of
environment, David authored
legislation to establish a five
year moratorium on the construc-
tion of nuclear power plants.
One of David's opponents in
the September 14 primary has
attempted to gain popularity
by suggesting that David's in-
volvement in such controversial
issues as gay rights has tainted.
his effectiveness as a legislator.
David's other primary opponent,
a former member of the legisla-
ture, failed to author a single
piece of legislation dealing
with gay rights during his 12
year tenure in the Assembly.
The voter turnout in the
September 14 primary is expect-
ed to be relatively low;
David will probably need only
2000 votes for a victory. A
strong campaign organization
is already at work to assure a
Clarenbach vote in the primary.
People can assist the campaign
by volunteering to help dis-
tribute literature, display
window signs and other activ-
ities. Call Pam wreski at
25-1638 if you want to help
in any way.
Lost importantly,
your vote can be decisive; be
sure to register and VOTE on
September 14.
Visit THE DOWN UNDER CLUB,
LaCross's newest gay bar,
at 787 North Losey Blvd,
just off US Hy. 16.
COUNSELING
REPORT
The counseling staff pro-
vides counseling and infor-
mation services to the Gay
Community in Madison. The
staff consists of non-pro-
fessional peer counselors
who undergo a training pro-
gram lasting about six weeks.
In addition the Center spon-
sors support groups for people
who would like to meet and
"rap" with gays in a setting
One
other than the bar.
such group is currently in
operation and another is
forming at the present time.
The type of counseling
the center provides varies
as widely as the clientele.
People in crisis, couples
having trouble getting along,
or people who are lonely and
just want someone to talk
to all seek us out.
Our
most frequent help, however,
is to people who have de-
cided to come out, but
don't quite know how to go
about it. For these people
we provide an escort for
their first trip to the bar,
and make intoductions.
The Center is open from
1-5 and 7-10 PM weekdays.
In addition to counseling,
anyone is welcome to drop
in and peruse our collection
of magazines and books.
The Center is currently
looking for volunteers to
serve as counselors. Any
one who is interested
should call the Center
during regular hours.
Ed Estes
Director, Counseling Staff
#
continued from page 1
ease, local politics and
gays, and lesbians and gay
men.
During the spring meetings
of the Committee for Gay
Rights, the idea of a group
of gays organizing to use
the media was discussed.
After the "Symposium on
Gays and the Law" inter-
ested people began org-
anizing a gay radio group.
Meetings have been held
throughout the summer
planning for the shou and
preparing a proposal for
WORT, "Back Forch" Radio.
Another group inter-
ested in TV production is
submitting a proposal to
Channel 21 for TRYOUT TV.
Contact John Young at 256-
2479 if you are interested
in working with a video group.
A.R.T.: GAY
COMMUNITY
THEATER
Initial productions of
adison's gay community theatre
are set to open at Freedom House
1925 winnebago, on Friday, August
27 at 8:30 p.m.
The new group has adopted
the name Arena Repertory Theatre,
reflecting their arena-style
staging and their plans for
keeping several productions play-
able at any given time.
"THE WAITING ROCK" by
John Bowen and "A TRAIN GOING
SOMEWHERE" by Gary Gardner will
open together, then enter rep-
3-
ertory, to played sometimes on
the same bill, sometimes sep-
arately. Other dates will be
announced later.
Sarah Whelan Blake is por-
traying Harriet and Ray Burns is
Paul in the Bowen play. Ms Blake
is one of Madison's foremost
actresses, the president of
Madison Theatre Guild last season.
Among her local triumphs is
Martha in the Guild production
of WHO'S AFRAID OF VIRGINIA WOOLF
She has worked with almost
every theatre in Madison and A.R.T.
is quite lucky to have her
services.
Ray Burns in one of the area's
busiest actors, having recently
performed here in KENNEDY'S
CHILDREN. He was recipient of
an MTG acting award for last
season's JESUS CHRIST SUPER-
STAR.
Heading the cast of Gary
Gardner's one act is Louie
Larsen, Nan Gardner, and Lars
Davis.
Director Davis will be
playing Eddie Pruitt as well as
directing both productions. He
has an extensive theatre back-
ground and is the founder and
acting president of A.R.T.
Larsen will be seen as Joby,
Eddie's lover, and Gardner
plays Linda Lou.
Margo Kelly and Nick
Marzano round out the casts.
Stage manager for WAITING
ROOI. is Eric Adams and Evan
Crawford handles the stage
Technical
managing of TRAIN.
staff includes hary Leigh, Vicki
Fontinelli and Bob Luhrsen.
A.R. T. is currently casting
two more one-acts which hope-
fully will join repertory in
continued
---
-4-
5-
late September.
They are ONCE
BELOW A LIGHTHOUSE by Ramon
Delgado and TREVOR, also by John
The first full-length
Bowen,
production is planned for Oct-
either FIND YOUR WAY HOME
ober,
by John Hopkins (if it is avail-
able), BUTLEY by Simon Gray, or
HARRY, NOON, AND NIGHT by Ronald
An original script by
Nick Marzano should follow.
Future. plans include Bertolt
Brecht's EDWARD II.
Ribson.
Officers for the theatre
are elected to terms lasting
through one rehearsal period and
opening. This is a method of
quality control.
New officers
will be elected September 12.
Current officers are Lars Davis
president; Ray Burns, vice pres-
ident; and Bob Luhrsen, secretary
treasurer.
Committee chairmen
are: Research-Burns and Vicki
Fontinelli; Booking-Ron York;
Busines-Luhrsen; Publicity-Zelda
Gooch; Community Relations-Evan
Crawford, Officers were elected
prior to any woman joining the
In the future all offices
group.
will be filled by both women and
men.
A.R.T. also has an acting
workshop meeting twice weekly.
These sessions will culminate in
a showcase.
General meetings are set
for each Sunday through August
at 7:00 p.m. at Freedom House
and anyone, gay or not, woman
or man, experienced ot not is
welcome to attend.
The theatre can be reached
through the Gay Center or by
writing A.R. T. c/o Freedom House,
1925 Winnebago, Madison, WI, 53704
INTEGRITY
Certainly one of the dis-
advantages of living in a
small community such as
kadison is the difficulty
in finding others of sim-
ilar interests in suff-
icient numbers to form an
Large
ongoing group.
cities have active ac-
tive chapters of the var-
ious Christian denomin-
ational gay groups, but
Fadison has none to my
knowledge, because no one
denomination has enough
gay people to organize such
a chapter.
While
I have just returned from
San Francisco and the an-
nual convention of Integrity,
the gay caucus of the
Episcopal Church.
there, I met a person from
Richmond, Virginia, who
described their successful
group composed of members
of Integrity, Dignity (Roman
Catholic,) Lutherans Con-
cerned for Gay People, the
Presbyterian Gay Caucus, et
al., which meets regularly.
Is anyone interested in our
trying the same thing in
Madison? If so, please
leave a message for me at
the Gay Center, 257-7575,
or PC Box 687, Madison,
53701, and 1 will contact
you.
(The Rev) william H.
Landram
OPEN LETTER TO THE GAY COMMUNITY
Over the past few weeks, I
have heard many rumors regarding
the policy of The Cardinal in re-
lation to being a gay bar. Some
people have even told me that the
word out there is that we do not
want gays to come to our bar.
This is obviously a malicious re-
mark, as anyone who knows anything
about what goes on at the Cardinal
will attest to.
It is difficult to point out
everything that hs taken place at
the Cardinal since we opened it.
I am sure we have made mistakes
and unconsciously alienated some
gays.
That was never out inten-
tion. When we first opened the
Cardinal, we did so only by word
of mouth among the gay community
of Madison and its closest friends.
For the first time in Madison's
history the gay community had an
up-front bar in which to be hon-
est and free about their homo-
sexuality and do so in the comp-
any of their most heterosexual of
friends. Most of our straight
friends loved the bar so much that
they in turn, brought their
straight friends, and so on.
Women in particular responded pos-
itively to the Cardinal, as we
were pro-feminism and did all we
could to ensure that women felt
comfortable and free of hassles.
It was only a matter of time,
however, considering the hetero-
homo ratio of the population at
large, for the straights to out-
number the gays. We realized
long ago the pattern which had
developed and continually sought
to maintain the bar gay by going
as far as putting up a sign at
the door advising people of where
the Cardinal was at. We kicked
people out of the bar for as much
as saying the wrong thing about
a gay person. There were numerous
confrontations between hetero men
and gay women, particularily over
the pool table, which prompted us
to take it out.
During this whole process of
struggle, we noticed that gay
people were really not struggling
with us and, in fact, were leaving
the Cardinal and going elsewhere.
It became obvious to me after a
while that we were actually be-
yond the point of no return, un-
less gays came to the bar in
force, it was becoming more and
more attractive and pleasant for
straights. By December of 1975,
I realized that the Cardinal was
pretty much straight and, al-
though many gays still come and
work here, the hetero vibes had
virtually taken over. By then,
my greatest concern became the
business itself.
Not being too fond of cap-
italism, having to think in terms
of business was enough challenge
for me. On the other hand, my
political self came out of the
closet, so to speak, and I got
more involved in community af-
fairs placing the Cardinal at
the services of this community.
We have therefore broadened our
base and are now entering what
amounts to a new period which
will reflect a more integrated,
open atmosphere, one that I
certainly wish gay people take
their place in.
The remarkable thing to
me has been the relative
peace and mellowness which has
been characteristic of the
Cardinal throughout our twenty
month existence. There have been
only two or three incidents of
actual violence inside the bar
and these were really minimal.
---
-6.
-7-
Furthermore, there has never
been a gay person who was
beaten up by straights in or
out of the premises of the bar.
This, I believe, is quite a
record, particularly when one
considers that the Cardinal is
on the "infamous" Wilson Street.
The Cardinal is a people's bar.
Our only great objection is to
those who do not understand and,
therefor, do not appreciate the
aesthetics of the place. Deco-
wise, the Cardinal is a period
bar, beautifully arranged and
designed in the manner of the
early 1900's. The management
is conscious of this fact and
strives to keep up an atmos-
phere free of plasticity. Even
the disco room, from a design
point of view, keeps in tune with
the old feeling of the place,
being basically art deco as a
follow up to the more nouveau-
ish style of the bar room.
Feeling-wise, the Cardinal is an
open environment, subject to all
kinds of vibrations which tend to
remain good most of the time.
Business-wise, we cannot risk
alienating potentially good
people on any account. And
last but not least, politically-
wise, we cannot discriminate on
personal basis, including sex-
ual orientation. We can only
ask that the gay community of
Madison patronize the bar and
thus create the atmosphere it
wants here. For gays should
certainly know by now that we
continue to be receptive to them
as they are the manifestation of
our own gayness.
Ricardo
SOCIAL SCIENCE VS
MINORITY RIGHTS - PART 2
Last month I looked at some
of the writings which down
through the years have passed
for scientific thought on the
subject of homosexuality. I
suggested that far from being
truly "scientific," such writ-
ing is really more of an in-
dulgence by the author in a
kind of fantasy. If this type
of writing was directed against
some other minority (blacks,
Jews, etc.), it would be easily
identified for what it is: hate
literature. Compare for ex-
ample, the Nazi "scientific"
writing on the subject of race.
Since gay people are the object
however, and since gay people
are still among the most unpop-
ular groups in all society, the
literature may still pass for
valid social science. It is
indeed, ironic that social
science, which has been used
to help other minorities (cf.
Kenneth Clark's "black dolls"
test, which aided blacks in
the school desegregation cases)
has at the same time been used
as a tool for the continued
oppression of gays.
But how does this system of
oppression work, and why have
so many professionals been,
until recently, only too eager
to participate in it? The meth-
odological errors in this lit-
erature are far too numerous to
analyze in a short article, but
one of the most important must
surely be the tendency on the
part of the researchers to
blame the victims. Though some-
times cloaked in kindness and
concern, the thrust of these
arguments is to blame the
oppressed group's problems and
inferior social status on some
characteristic of the group it-
self, rather than on majority
prejudice. Thus, as we saw,
writers like Bergler come up
with a laundry list of negative
characteristics to apply to
gay people, but ignore the
prejudice and bigotry of the
straight majority as possible
contributors to the emotional
problems of gay people. Given
the level of prejudice, it
would be strange not to expect
gay people to have problems
connected with guilt and a poor
self-image. Since the image
most of us have of ourselves is
in part a reflection of what
others around us think of us,
the oppression which manifests
itself on a political level in
the form of legal and social
discrimination often does even
more damage on a personal level
to individual members of the
minority group. For so many
supposedly "objective" and
"liberal" social scientists to
have ignored this all-too-
obvious point for so many years
cannot help but make on sus-
picious, if not cynical, about
their true motives.
Incidentally, gays are not
the only minority to have been
subjected to the tender mercies
of blaming social scientists.
Compare the series of "reports"
on the problems of the black
urban poor (Moynihan, Coleman,
Jensen, etc.). An additional
effect of the fallacy on both
gays and blacks has been to
permit these scholars and the
larger society they represent
to ignore the substantive con-
tent of the protests which have
been articulated by these
groups. Since we are just
"neurotics" who are acting out
our various symptoms, any ideas
we put forth are tainted by this
presumed lack of rationality on
our part. This places the schol-
ars, and the public, in the lux-
urious position of not having
to respond to the content of our
protests with serious, reasoned
rebuttals. People profoundly
neurotic, functionally illiter-
ate, or racially inferior cannot
be expected to advance solid,
lucid arguments or opinions so
the public can comfortably and
complacently ignore them. To
put it bluntly, in their eyes
we are reduced to something less
than full-fledged human beings.
In conclusion I should note
that in the pst five years or so
some of these professional atti-
tudes have begun to change.
The work of Thomas Szasz, Evelyn
Hooker, George Weinberg, Seymour
Halleck, and C.A. Tripp among
others, has given us reason to
hope that we may soom see the
end of this dreadful literature.
Ed Estes
(continued from p. 8)
Attention all of you
who might be interested in
working on the newsletter:
an open meeting of the
Newsletter/Publications
Committee will be held on
Sept. 19 at the Center
starting at 7:30 P.M.
If you cannot attend send
a card or note and tell
us what you are interested
in doing.
J.M. Lindert
---
-8-
GINNY VIDA SPEAKS
Ginny Vida, Media Director of
the National Gay Task Force
addressed fifty people Saturday
(June 19) at the Symposium on
Gays and the Law.
The prime media goal of the
NGTF is, "No more negative por-
trayals of gay people until
there are positive portrayals."
The Gay Media Task Force in Los
Angeles act as consultants to
the networks which have broad-
casting standards committed to
sensitivity towards gay people
as well as other minorities.
Their judgment has proved
faulty. The Gay Media Alert
Network of 250 groups through-
out the country has pressured
the networks by getting local
stations to cancel such shows
as "The Outrage" a Marcus
Wellby episode and by getting
advertisers to withdraw spon-
sorship. However, the networks
still exclude gay themes during
family viewing times.
News coverage of events im-
portant to gays has never been
good. No national network has
covered Gay Pride Week, nor did
they solicit responses from the
Gay Community regarding the
Supreme Court decision. ABC
will, however, include a clip
June 27 on Jean O'Leary, a gay
delegate to the Democratic
Convention. ABC also plans a
documentary on Gays in America.
Vida encouraged gay groups
to use all events, good or bad,
to stir media attention. The
unprecedented opposition to
the last New York City Gay
Rights Bill drew unprecedented
media attention to the issues
involved. The Supreme Court
decision upholding Virginia's
sodomy statutes could have been
used by local groups construct-
ively.
The NGTF publishes a "How to
Deal with the Media." Vida
recommended we start a Gay Radio
show, conduct awareness sessions
with news directors, and part-
icipate in talk shows. She also
encouraged us to discourage local
stations from buying "Born
Innocent." She noted that the
media looks toward male author-
ity figures. Therefore gay men
must learn to defer to the woman
if an interviewer asks him all
the questions.
"Gaining control of the media
is essential for gaining control
of our lives.
=
FROM THE EDITOR:
Mark McNary
This newsletter if the
publication of the GAY CENTER
located at 1001 University
Ave. The GAY CENTER and the
RENAISSANCE NEWSLETTER are
supported by your contrib-
utions. For information
about contributing or more
information about the GAY
CENTER drop us a card care
of our post box, drop in
and visit, or call 257-7575.
To those thoughtful
people who support us thru
monthly membership donations
we apologize for not being
able to put out the news-
letter during the Summer.
We hope you will continue
to support our efforts.
Continued on page 7
---
bos
GAY MADISON
NOV 20 RECU
Published by The United 306 North Brooks Madison, Wisconsin 53715
NUMBER 16
OCTOBER-NOVEMBER, 1981
FREE
255-8582
No Place In the Socialist
Revolution - A Place Here?
08 The volunteer staff and advisors of GAY
MADISON are anxious to see major local news
issues analyzed from a Lesbian or Gay per-
spective. This is especially true when Gays
and Lesbians are important players in these
news stories and this fact is ignored.
"The Cuban Situation" is one such story.
This is the first of a two-part feature which
will focus on the forces causing the current
generation of Gay Cubans to become refugees;
their adjustment to life in Madison; the
reaction of Madison's Anglo Gay community
and the impact which recent arrests have
had on Lesbian and Gay Cubans.
In this first segment GAY MADISON'S
Kathleen Nichols interviews Grid Hall, the
public Defender who handles a majority of
the cases involving Spanish-speaking defen-
dants in Madison. Hall is a Gay, bilingual,
Anglo who is concerned that Madison, includ-
ing Gay Madison, is not reacting well to the
newest members of our growing racial and
ethnic minority community.
-K.N.:
When you were traveling in Cuba in
1979 what was the official party position
on homosexuality?
G.H.: We were told by officials that there
was no discrimination against homosexuals
in Cuba. But officially homosexuals cannot
be members of the party...can't teach, can't
occupy any position of authority in the
society...which seemed discriminatory to me.
K.N.: Did you meet any Gays who were mili-
tants?
G.H.: I never met any. I heard stories
about people, but the ones who are militants
continued on page 2 -
AB 70- On to the Senate! q
"Courage and a sense of justice is
still very much alive in Wisconsin, " said
Barbara Lightner, spokesperson for The
United.
The remark was made following passage of
Assembly Bill 70, a bill prohibiting dis-
crimination on the basis of sexual orienta-
tion in employment, housing, and public ac-
comodations in the state. The measure was
approved on a vote of 50 to 46, and marks
the first time any house of any state leg-
islature has furthered such a law.
"We know that efforts have been made,"
Lightner said, "to revive the old McCarthy
tradition of homophobia and intimidation
in Wisconsin. But Representative David
Clarenbach, primary sponsor of the bill,
and his Assembly colleagues have stopped
that tradition cold by standing up to be
counted in their votes for social justice
for Lesbians and Gay men."
"We should also recongize the courage
of many of the churches and individual
clergy in speaking up in support of the
legislation," Lightner said.
"The re-
sponse was overwhelmingly positive on the
part of 'mainstream' churches,' " she added,
"showing that the Christian tradition is
not in fact dominated by the strident
cries of hatred and bigotry we so often
hear from a moralistic minority.'
Passage of the bill came after two and
a half years of work on the part of Wis-
consin's Lesbians and Gay men.
"Of par-
ticular importance to our success was
Leon Rouse of Milwaukee," Lightner said,
"who almost single-handedly educated the
Wisconsin churches regarding the legisla-
continued on page 3
1
---
AB 70- On
continued from page 1
tion, and did much to create a positive
climate for its passage.
"
The bill is now in the Senate, where
it will be acted on as soon as possible,
probably early in January. Little diffi-
culty is anticipated for passage, and Wis-
consin will then become the first state
in the country to guarantee Gay people the
right to legal recourse when they encoun-
ter discrimination.
Worship in the Temple of the Truly
Pissed Off by Sandra Finn-Curkeet
Robin Tyler is a comic. We know this is
true because she tells us it is. And she
made believers of anyone who attended her
October 17th performance here in Madison.
That night the somber arched confines
of Pres House quaked with laughter, shook
with knee-slapping, floor-pounding appre-
ciation; and resonated with the sounds only
helpless side splitting mirth can make.
That night the Most Irreverend Robin Tyler
turned the Pres House Chapel into the
Temple of the Truly Pissed Off, and
a whole new meaning to the phrase "rolling
in the aisles."
gave
After
So who are the "truly pissed off" and
why does Tyler bid us to join their ranks?
Why would anyone who is truly pissed off
find anything laughable in that? What's
so funny about being angry anyway?
all, anger is the result of feeling threat-
ened, experiencing pain or being betrayed.
There are some answers to be found in
Tyler's comedy.
Robin Tyler announces, "I did not have
it easy as a child. Who here tonight had
it easy as a child?" One person responds
affirmatively. "Get out!" says Tyler,
"because the rest of us did not have it
easy as a child!" Ah...now we can, for
a time, be one with the comic.
We go
back with her to examine the confusion
and sometime absurdity of growing up
"different." She says, "I really didn't
know what was, but I knew whatever I was,
I was the only one." The mostly empathetic
audience is then regaled with stories of a
Lesbian adolescence (these can last a long
time). On a first crush: "She was the
model for every woman I have ever loved
a cross between Katherine Hepburn, Grace
Kelly and Humphrey Bogart." On lost love:
"...and somehow I knew this was the way
-
it would be always a bridesmaid, never a
groom." On hard realities: "I guess I've
always thought that monogamy was a kind of
dark wood you polish.
"
And Tyler does not forget her Gay
brothers.
She speaks fondly of her friend
Terry, a Gay man who with his precocious
pride helped Tyler through difficult times.
She recalls asking him, "Terry, why are you
Gay? I mean, was your mother too dominant,
your father too passive?" Terry's response
(circa 1959): "I don't know darling, I
guess I was just born lucky!" Do we cry?
We do not. We laugh at those old pains,
and they seem manageable. Tyler lets us
own our anger and makes it preventive medi-
cine for younger Gays and Lesbians.
Then imagine, if you will, the over
three hundred people in the audience singing
"Silent Night" while Robin Tyler simulates
the position, screams and groans of pre-
Lamaze childbirth. She puts that immaculate
conception to rest. She gives birth to
truth and wraps it in the swaddling clothes
of contradiction. "Jesus Christ," she says
"was really no different than many other
Jewish boys. He lived with his parents
for thirty years, took up his father's
profession and his mother thought he was
God." Should we laugh? Jerry Falwell
would not.
It
Tyler's performance reminds us of our
history which must not be forgotten.
reduces prevalent religions, social and
political systems to a level where they can
be seen as ludicrous. But it also examines
the contradictions within ourselves (Tyler
punctuates her performance with asides from
her "butch" alter ego, the tough, more
demonic, sometimes politically incorrect
dyke). We must acknowledge these also.
After two hours of high-energy hilarity
and invocations to those of us who've come
to understand we are "the truly pissed off,"
Robin Tyler pauses. She stops the comedy
for a few moments to make a plea for coa-
lition. She asks that for survival's sake,
those of us who are more alike than not,
come together to oppose the forces and sys-
tems which would oppress us. She also asks
that we pass on our talents and skills to
others so that the effort does not die.
And lastly, the Tyler Benediction:
any of you here tonight have felt the least
bit offended by this material you probably
needed it."
-
"If
---
GAY MADISON
Published by The United 306 North Brooks Madison, Wisconsin 53715
NUMBER 15
SEPTEMBER, 1981
FREE
Some Words from
the Rural Connection
After reading "Update on
Gay Rights Legislation" by
David Clarenbach in the last
issue of Gay Madison, I
wrote to my state represen-
tative, James Laatsch. He
represents the 80th dis-
trict which includes the
Spring Green, Baraboo, Sauk
City and Reedsburg areas.
I thought Gay Madison
would be interested in his
response so I have enclosed
a copy of our correspon-
dence.
I am a Christian Les-
bian and have a particular
concern about Representa-
tive Laatsch's views in
that he's a clergyman.
My intention is to meet with
him in the near future to
discuss AB 70 and the im-
portance of Gay civil
rights.
September 8, 1981
Dear Mr. Laatsch:
As a Christian I am
interested in eliminating
the oppression that exists
in our society. In par-
ticular I ask you to support
passage of AB 70 which would
prohibit discrimination in
employment, housing or
public accommodations be-
cause of sexual preference.
continued on page 4
Meg Christian Turns it Over
by Sandra Finn-Curkeet
And oh our revolutions
Slowly spin me out
And draw me in
11
-Meg Christian,
Turning it Over
Surviving or "taking a
look at what it takes to
stay alive," says Meg Chris-
tian, "is an all encompass-
ing process. She goes on
to explain that action,
whether political, cultural
or personal "starts inter-
nally" and that which is
manifested externally can-
not be viable without in-
ternal peace and well being.
It seems like such a
simple idea really, but an
elusive one%3B one that seems
to be the focus of Meg
Christian's latest album,
Turning It Over.
I had the brief pleasure
of speaking informally with
the composer and lyricist
about her new album, and
about her concert tour
which recently included
a visit to Madison. Dur-
ing our conversation it was
apparent that Christian
maintains a commitment to
supporting the work Lesbians
must undertake to survive,
but she also emphasizes the
importance of taking care
of ourselves. "I denied
myself rest," she said,
"and attempted to take
everything upon myself
finally I had to take a
look at myself and reality.
I had to realize I was be-
coming sick inside."
continued on page 3
More Support for AB 70
The Governor's Advisory
Council for Women and Family
Initiatives has voted, with
only one dissenting vote, to
support AB 70, the bill which
would prohibit discrimina-
tion based on sexual orien-
tation. In a September 8th
memo to the bill's primary
author, David Clarenbach,
the council stated it is
"committed to supporting
legislation that prohibits
obstacles to free choices
in employment, educational
opportunities and housing."
The memo further states
that many homosexual indi-
viduals who lead "exemplary
lives" enjoy non-discrimina-
tion only because their sexual
orientation is not known.
The council maintains:
"Since honesty is a cherished
value of our society, it
follows that individuals
should be able to honestly
pursue their goals as con-
tributing members of society
without fear and anxiety
regardless of their sexual
orientation."
---
GAY
Renaissance Newsletter
February, 1977
UW Creates Committee to Deal with Gay Discrimination
The University of Wisconsin has taken a
major step in recognizing the rights, legi-
timacy and special problems of gay people
on campus. It has created an Assistance
Committee made up equally of UW Administra-
tion and representatives of the gay and
Lesbian communities.
The committee meets monthly to discuss
and act upon any case of discrimination
against a gay student. According to a
statement issued by Dean of Students Paul
Ginsberg, "This committee will be willing
to listen, to be supportive, and to inter-
vene and help in any way it can. Conversa-
tion with the committee will not become a
matter of record, and any intervention or
assistance by the Committee will occur
only with the gay person's approval."
The committee consists of members of the
Dean of Students' office, including Gins-
berg himself, plus two representatives
each from the Lesbian Switchboard and the
Renaissance Gay Center. Chuck Lepard and
Bill Handy are the Gay Center's representa-
tives.
Anyone wishing to meet with the committee
to discuss a grievance can contact either
the Lesbian Switchboard at 257-7378,
the Gay Center at 257-7575, or the Dean of
Students office at 263-5700. The committee
is meeting every month whether or not
there are grievances. Currently the com-
mittee is discussing the possibility of a
Statement of Concern to be issued by the
university setting out a gay rights policy.
The assistance committee was the result
of long discussions between community
people and Ginsberg's staff. Its stated
purposes are:
--To hear from individuals about
experiences of perceived discrimination
based on sexual preference in the Univer-
sity community;
--To be a liaison between aggrieved
individuals and the parts of the system
where individuals encounter difficulty;
--To raise the consciousness of the
UW community and increase its sensitivity
to peoblems of being gay, and to make gay
people aware of existing services for
them in the University community.
Survivor's Notes: Memories of the '62 Gay Purge
EDITOR'S NOTE: The year 1962 was not
the University of Wisconsin's most libera-
ted moment. The doctrine of in loco paren-
tis was firmly in place. Women were requi-
red to be in their dorms by 10:30 on week-
nights. Students had to stay in campus
housing until they were 21.
In the midst of this generally repres-
sive setting a purge of campus homosexuals
was conducted by the Department of Protec-
tion and Security and the Dean of Men.
Between October 1962 and February 1963 the
gay community was terrorized by a full-
scale inquisition.
What follows are a survivor's notes.
The gay man who is the subject of the
following interview is presently on the
UW academic staff. His request for anon-
ymity is discussed in the interview. His
recollections have been slightly edited
for continuity. They are presented here
for the interest of Madison gays who may
not know what the "bad old days" were
like, or might be like.
Q: What are your memories of how this
purge took place?
A: At the time of what has come to
be called the Great Purge of '62 I was a
sophomore. I was living at the time with
one straight man and one gay man. Over the
course of a week or two I had been recei-
ving a phone call or two a week from the
Department of Protection and Security.
For some reason I got it into my head that
they were looking for a stolen bicycle
or I had a parking ticket. I had no indic-
ation of why these messages were being
left, and since I had no reason to cor-
respond with the Department of Protection
and Security that I could think of, I just
said to hell with the Department of Pro-
tection and Security.
One evening, I guess it was about this
time of year, I received a call from a
graduate student friend of mine, also a.
gay man, whp happened to be in the French
(Continued on next page)
---
THE UNITED
306 North Brooks
Madison, Wisconsin 53715
YES,
(608) 255-8582
LYSISTRATA WILL BE OPEN FOR THE UNITED'S
non-ALCOHOLK
FIRST COFFEEHOUse
6-10pm
#1 Doration
SUNDAY,
OCT. 4
& Don'T FORSEF:
he Caronar Bar's
Lesbian Gas SAY
DISHES BESinning
THIS SUNDAY Ocs. 4,
cun con
Cornuary
Susey Sunway
The
Cardinal
Bar
418 E. Wilson
251-0080
REMEMBER THE GAY EQUINOX?
Now, every Sunday, a night
for Gay Men and Lesbians
to benefit the United.
FEATURING:
Your Favorite D.J.'s
Guest Bartenders
Drink Specials
(non-alcoholic & Spirited)
Cocktail Buffet
Raffles
Games
Theatre
and
much
more!
SUNDAYS 4-1
$1
---
OUR
HORIZONS
WISCONSIN'S GAY/LESBIAN NEWSMAGAZINE
Volume 1 Number 5
Thursday, November 5, 1981
50¢
By Theresa Ferris
DRIFTWOOD
or
DRIFTING
GAYS?
Spotlighting:
Wisconsin Gay Rights?
Vital Perspectives
Black/White Men
Together
---
A.B. 70
CUTE, CAMPY, COCKY AND YOURS!
THE VIOLENT FEMMES
SM
AT THE PHOENIX! NOV. 11 & 12
235 S. 2ND ST. STARTS AT 8P.M. $2 COVER
MORE THEN MUSIC AND A SHOW!
Wisconsin Gay Law? Maybe.
Three votes in the Wisconsin State
Assembly was the margin of victory for
A.B. 70, the Wisconsin State Human
Rights bill which would insure non-
discrimination for Gays. At precisely
11:18 a.m. on Friday, Oct. 23rd, the
Assembly moved to pass this Bill by a
vote of 49 to 45. Shortly after the vote
of record another representative who
had been out of the room notified the
Chair that he wished to be recorded as
a no vote.
Several parliamentary procedures
before and after this historic vote
moved to block passage of this bill.
The routing that yet remains is that the
bill now moves to the State Senate,
where, according to Leon Rouse, "We
are cautiously hopeful." Hearings are
expected to take place in late Janu-
ary 1982.
Passage of the bill in the Senate
would move it to the desk of Gov.
Lee Dreyfus. In a memorandum to
Assembly Rep. David Clarenbach, the
Governor's Advisory Council for
Women and Family Initiatives states:
"There are many examples of indi-
viduals who have enjoyed non-
discrimination in housing, employ-
ment and education who, in fact, are
homosexual. They have often enjoyed
these choices without discrimination
or harassment because their sexual
orientation was unknown. They have
led exemplary lives in most cases and
where they have not, they have been
held responsible for their behavior as
I have other members of the human
family." There was one dissenting vote
of the committee.
According to some legislative
watchers, "it would be easy to sit
back with this encouraging news, but
at anytime the Moral Majority and its
friends could mount an attack like it
did in Washington D.C. and the bill
could be killed in the Senate or at
Dreyfus's desk. Neither the Assembly
nor Senate would have the 2/3rd vote
necessary to override a Governor's
veto.
"
Rouse then pointed out that, "It
cannot be forgotten that Milwaukee
Assembly members Gus Menos, James
Rutkowski and George Klicka all op-
pose this bill."
Work on A.B. 70 began in the fall of
1979. Rouse, the 24 year old coordi-
nator of the Committee for Funda-
mental Judeao/Christian Human
Rights spent endless hours not only
lobbying each member of the legis-
latre and senate, but took the time to
dig out minute details about the back-
ground and voting record for every
elected official.
Once again a primary area of sup-
port for this Wisconsin Bill has come
from the churches. Letters of support
from most of the mainline churches
were an essential key to the success-
ful passage of A.B. 70 according to
Rouse. He went on to recall, "Cer-
tain pastors and bishops would get on
the phone directly to a given member
of the Assembly to query their vote
and actively urge their support. It
was great!" (See additional story on
church support.)
Financial support for this program
has come primarily from the United
Gay Students at the University of
Wisconsin-Milwaukee. This $1,400 has
provided the fundamental support,
but, according to Rouse, much more is
needed. "To this date we have re-
ceived NO financial support from any
Milwaukee Gay group," Rouse said.
"It is important to know," Rouse
pointed out, "that this bill is NOT a
consenting adults bill. That bill was de-
feated by one vote." According to
Kathleen Curran, a State of Wiscon-
sin Legislative Attorney, "this bill
does not make any changes in statutes
which deal with "Crimes Against
Sexual Morality". The prohibition
against sexual intercourse with
someone who is not a person's spouse,
cohabitants, public sexual activity
or exposure and anal or oral sexual
activity are still against the law for all
in Wisconsin."
However, Currans
noted:
memorandum
"This Bill prohibits dis-
crimination on the basis of sexual
orientation in the areas of employ-
ment, housing and public accom-
modations... The Bill draft defines
sexual orientation as having a prefer-
ence for either heterosexuality,
homosexuality or bisexuality."
If this Bill is signed into law, Wis-
consin will join only California and
Pennsylvania with similar laws. Ac-
cording to statistics collected on Gay
Rights in the United States, while 48
states have no bill like A.B. 70, 25
states do have Consenting Adults
Legislation.
Photo by Doug Haas
-Page 3-
---
WISCONSIN LAWS
Continued from page 13
These counties and the ones below
reporting zero arrests, prosecutions.
and convictions comprise 32.38% of
the population of Wisconsin, accord-
ing to the 1979 State Blue Book. Hence.
the projected figures in the opening
sentence of this article.
The following counties reported no
arrests. prosecutions, or convictions
for 1977-79: Ashland. Barron. Buffalo,
Burnett. Florence. Forest, Iowa.
Kewaunee. La Crosse. Lincoln. Mar-
quette. Menominee. Oconto, Oneida.
Pepin. Pierce. Richland. Rock. St.
Croix. Taylor. Vernon. Washburn.
Waupaca, and one unidentified county.
Appendix (
The following counties did not
respond: Bayfield. Clark. Columbia.
Crawford. Dunn. Grant. Green().
Iron(). Jackson, Kenosha. Lafayette.
Iangladet). Manitowoc. Marathon.
Marinettet). Monroe, Ozaukee. Price.
Racine. Rusk. Sauk. Sawyer. Sheboy-
gan, Trempealeau. Walworth. Waush-
ara.
() These four responded. but with
fewer than the three years tabulated.
Appendix A
District attorneys were asked to give
statistics in their counties for the years
1970-79 Since many lacked earlier
data. here are included the figures only.
County
Arrests
for the last three years, 1977-79. See
Appendices B and C for counties not
included here.
Prosecutions
Convictions
Adams
Chippewa
3
I
2
2
Door
'
0
Fau Claire
33
3.3
30
Fond du Lac
4
3
Green Lake
0
Jefferson
6
(
6
Juneau
I
0
Polk
I
1
Portage
0
0
Shawano
1
1
1
Vilas
2
Washington
3
Waukesha
24
24
24
3-year totals
83
81
70
Average per year 28
27
23
• Pending.
Toute Crew is associate professor and quilts
ader to the fan People's Inien at the Iniversity
if Wisconsin, Stevens Poi
---
New York Native 3/15-28/82
NUNS IN THE GALLERY
The Church, David
Clarenbach, and
Wisconsin's
Gay Rights Bill
by Carol Stroebel
W
isconsin bas become the first
state in the union to enact a
gay civil rights law. The state
Senate passed Assembly Bill 70 on a voice
vote February 17. (See "Rights Bill Passes
Wisconsin Senate; Will Go to Governor
for Signature," Native 32.) As expected,
Republican Gov. Lee Sherman Dreyfus
signed AB 70 February 25.
The driving force bebind the bill in
the state legislature was its author, state
Rep. David Clarenbach (D-Madison).
Clarenbach, who was 18 when first elect-
ed to public office, is now 28 and bas
represented downtown Madison in the
Assembly for eight years. He has intro-
duced legislation for gay civil rights
each year be has been in the statebouse.
The Native interviewed him in bis legis-
lative offices.
Carol Stroebel: Wisconsin is the first
state to pass such a bill, correct?
Rep. David Clarenbach: Yes. I don't
think it's any fluke or mistake that it
occurred in Wisconsin first. One would
think that New York or California, with
their large and highly politically active
gay communities in sensitive environ-
ments, would be the place for that first
step to be taken. But Wisconsin has a
tradition of progressive and innovative
legislation.
Is that the only reason?
No, a lot of groundwork was laid here
that perhaps, other states have not laid.
We succeeded in creating an environment
of political security by confronting the
Moral Majority and their issues. We con-
fronted them and played their game.
Naturally, politicians are afraid to
offend even a very narrow minority if
they are single-issue and very vocal. Thus
the alleged strength of the Moral Majority.
In Wisconsin, our assessment was that if
the members of the legislature were
allowed to have a secret vote on the gay
rights issue-which, of course, they
can't-they would vote for it..
Our quest was to create some politi-
cal security and an environment where we
could match the Moral Majority and the
ultra-right-wing religious constituency
with some equal strength of our own on
religious issues. That, more than anything
else, was the key to our success.
We generated almost unanimous-
literally across-the-board-endorsements
of the bill from the leaders and constit-
uencies of the mainstream religions in
the state. We got the Archbishop of
Milwaukee to endorse the bill. To have
the Archbishop writing letters, to have
nuns carted in from all over the state to
lobby senators and representatives, that
counts for a lot. We created a situation so
that any legislator who voted for a gay
rights bill could run for reelection in the
fall or could respond to a reactionary
1
Wisconsin state representative David Clarenbach.
minister raising trouble in his district
by dragging out a dozen letters from the
bishops of Catholic, Methodist, Lutheran,
and other denominations from around
Why the Governor Signed the Bill
Following is a statement issued by
Wisconsin Gov. Lee Sherman Dreyfus,
a moderate Republican, explaining bis
decision to sign Assembly Bill 70, the
state's gay civil rights bill, into law.
Dreyfus signed the measure Thursday,
February 25, and it went into effect
the following day.
AB 70 prohibits discrimination in
employment, housing, and public
accommodations based on sexual
orientation. This bill has a contro-
versial history, and my office has been
under heavy pressure to veto it. It also,
however, has the support of a wide-
ranging group of religious leadership,
including leadership of the Roman
Catholic Church, several Lutheran
synods, and the Jewish community..
1 have decided to sign this bill for
one basic reason: to protect one's right
to privacy. As one who believes in the
fundamental Republican principle that
government should have a very
restricted involvement in people's pri-
vate and personal lives, I feel strongly
about governmentally sanctioned
inquiry into an individual's thoughts,
beliefs, and feelings.
Discrimination on sexual preference,
if allowed, clearly must allow inquiries
into one's private life that go beyond
reasonable inquiry and in-fact invade
the state.
The issue was not whether homosexu-
ality was admirable or good, because
clearly, according to many of the
one's privacy. No one ought to have
the right and no one ought to be
placed in the position of having to
reveal such personal information when
it is not directly related to an overrid-
ing public purpose.
Be certain to understand that the
clear and stated intent expressed by
the legislature is that this policy will
not require affirmative action or
quotas. That was vital to my decision
to sign this bill. I was also influenced
by the fact that Madison, Dane
County, and the City of Milwaukee
have ordinances similar to this legis-
lation. The problems associated with
them which many predicted just have
not arisen.
Let me firmly state that this
restriction on discriminatory actions
or decisions does not imply approval
or encouragement any more than the
restriction on discrimination because
of a religion or creed implies approval
or encouragement of certain religions
or creeds.
or
As to the relationship of this
subject to the process of education. I
feel very strongly that one's sexual
preferences, either homosexual
heterosexual, have absolutely no place
for expression in our classrooms
generally, and should not be tolerated.
religions, homosexuality is not acceptable
conduct. The question was not homosex-
uality; it was whether discrimination and
bigotry were tolerable. The response by
mainstream religious leaders was clearly:
"We cannot condone discrimination and
bigotry against any minority group."
You have been trying to get this bill.
passed for years. Why did it pass now,
when the strength of the regressives
appears to be growing?
We confronted the alleged strength of
the Moral Majority and found that it was
alleged at best. The Moral Majority really
represents only a very narrow segment of
the population.
Since the state Senate concurred on
the bill, the Moral Majority tried to gener-
ate an avalanche of phone calls through a
Christian radio network that broadcasts
"emergency alerts." That network across
the state could only generate a little over
1,000 phone calls, which is a pittance. It
is a demonstration of their small numbers,
Yet they've been able to strike fear in the
hearts of politicians all across the country.
I think politicans, policy makers, and the
public are recognizing that they are no
more than fanatics who do not by any
means represent the majority sentiment.
No amendments were offered on the
bill-not the old exempt-the-school-
teachers amendment, not the old exempt-
the-National-Guard issue because you
don't want a bunkmate who's a pervert.
There are a thousand ways to kill a bill.
All sorts of issues could have been raised
but weren't.
How difficult was it to get together
this coalition?
It was a very long task. In many
instances it started at the grassroots level
with individuals initiating action in meet-
ings of their denominations..
It led to an interesting contradiction.
It was the first session this bill was
brought up for a vote and it passed.
Yet, the other issue of sex law reform,
the consenting adult bill-which would
have legalized sex acts that are allowed by
law in the majority of states now-has
been brought to a vote on numerous
occasions and has lost each time. It's
illegal to perform homosexual sex acts
in Wisconsin yet you are protected by law
against discrimination if you are a homo-
sexual.
The Catholic church did not support
the consenting adults bill because, in their
view, that entered into the, moral
question of the sex act itself. But the
issue is very different when we talk about
discrimination, when we talk about deny-
ing someone a job or a home. The
support we got from the Catholic church
was especially instrumental.
Do you see other states following suit?
I think the historic significance is that
if Wisconsin-a Midwestern, middle-sized,
rural, quasi-conservative state which has
nothing particular to offer in terms of a
gay rights constituency-if we can do it,
any state can do it. Alabama can do it,
much less a New York or a California.
While one cannot take the blueprint
from the Wisconsin experience and
simply transpose it to any state in the
union, there are some valuable lessons.
If nothing else, the lesson of encourage.
ought to
brought to every state. With the proper
groundwork, and the proper understand-
ing that the issue ought not to be articu-
lated as homosexuality good or bad, but
as discrimination and bigotry, it can
Continued on page 36
ment and
momentum
be
---
Continued from page 15
succeed in any state.
But it's not something that can be
accomplished overnight. I cringe when I
see votes such as last year in the Illinois
House of Representatives on their gay
rights bill, where it lost 100-and-some-
thing to 33. They obviously felt it more
important to go for a vote and lose big
than to spend those several years
necessary to organize a major state.
We had to create an incentive to vote
for the bill. A politician had to think
twice when he looked up in the gallery on
the day of the vote and saw a nun from
his district who had badgered the hell out
of him in leters and personal visits the
preceding two weeks, and who was sitting
up there staring at him with the message:
"You should vote for this bill because it
is right." In the other states, it's been
quite the opposite, It's been the right-
wing religious fanatics who have been
perched in the gallery, who have been
haunting the hell out of these people
to the point where they have been
politically afraid to vote for a gay rights
bill.
What about the consenting adults bill?
The consenting adults bill will fall in
place, and we have seen this trend over
the last few sessions. It's just a matter of
time before Wisconsin will enter the
20th century.
You've been working for years,
patiently pursuing passage of the gay
rights bill. Do you see counterparts in
other legislatures?
There are committed, politically active
legislators in each state who are involved
in issues such as this. It's a matter of
having the commitment to make this a
priority. It is important, essential, to,
have someone on the inside who is will
ing to play the game and manipulate
the process from that end of things as
well. The legislature here and in every
state is very much a network of friends,
and if there is someone who is difficult
to work with as a colleague, they are less
likely to get the marginal votes. I'm now
in my eighth year in the legislature and
have generated the credibility I needed to
have that entree into a colleague's office,
to explain how this would not hurt him
politically.
What is it like being a gay rights
activist in the Midwest?
It's not any more difficult advocating
the issue of rights for lesbians and gay
men in Madison, Wisconsin, than it is any-
place else. One does not encounter ill
will, outside of extremely redneck con-
stituencies that I tend to stay away from.
To shy away from a very central involve-
ment in gay rights in the 1980s is like
ignoring civil rights and the Vietnam war
in the 1960s.
It did concern me at the public hearing
at the Senate in late January when some
of the activists from Milwaukee showed
up with their stack of newspapers and
magazines to distribute to the committee
for their general information and edifi--
cation, outlining the advantages of boy | occur in other states, demonstrate a fail-
ing on the part of those organizing the
effort, that they didn't lay the ground-
work well enough, or they pushed the
vote too soon. Or perhaps they relied on
the activism and commitment of the gay
community, which we certainly did not
do here. There is still a tendency on the
part of the gay community to be non-
political and uninvolved.
love and S&M worship and chains. They
thought this would-be a marvelous edu-
cational experience for the committee.
My heart stopped. I offered to distribute
the magazines at a more appropriate time.
I thank my lucky stars that no senators
who were opposed to the bill got their
hands on that, because that would have
been enough to kill the bill. One sena-
tor, waving one of these magazines
around, saying, "This is what you're
condoning with this bill," would have
put AB 70 in the toilet. There is a
sector of the gay lifestyle which would
be rather unacceptable to mainstream
Wisconsinites. Yet, even in those small
Midwestern towns that you think of in
Norman Rockwell paintings, there is an
overriding commitment to the principle
of live and let live, love and let love. I
don't think it's a conscious commitment
to gay rights as such. I think most people
in this country still can't relate to, can't
conceive of a homosexual-I might be
very wrong, because obviously the media
have educated and sensitized the public
on the existence of homosexuals. But I
think there's a real commitment to the
principle that individuals have a right to
sexual privacy. If that were not the case,
this bill would have gone down in
thunderous defeat.
What do you see next on the
rights agenda?
gay
civil
Very few additions to legislative pro-
grams for gays can be realistically accom-
plished at this time. The struggle for
social acceptance, to sensitize the public
about gay people, is one that will have to
be carried on through enforcement of
the existing anti-discrimination
tections and through other means of
public education.
pro-
In much the same way that there are
bigots and people who believe in race
hatred, it will take generations for
lesbians and gay men to be accepted in
our society. That struggle ought to
continue on every front. But the laws
have to come first. The laws are not an
end in themselves, and we must be
vigilant to see that those laws are
carried out to the extent of their intent.
There will be continued struggles here,
Those unfortunate defeats, when they I'm sure. It's not all over.
---
Volume 7/ Number 20
THE INTERNATIONAL GAY NEWSLEADER
CHICAGO
GayLife
Comp50 entary
Wisconsin assembly
passes gay rights bill
By Stephen Kulieke
Wisconsin took a major step toward becoming the first
state in the nation to enact comprehensive gay rights laws
when the state Assembly approved a bill Oct. 23 banning
"sexual orientation" discrimination and sent it on to the
Senate for consideration.
"What happened here today is a victory for gay people
everywhere," said an ebullient Rep. David Clarenbach
(D-Madison), following the successful vote. "Let the
Moral Majority and hatemongers take notice that the gay
rights movement and human decency are alive and well."
Assembly Bill 70, of which Clarenbach is the primary
author, passed the Assembly by a 50-46 vote. (Two other
representatives on opposite sides of the issue did not
actually vote but recorded their positions through a legis-
lative device known as "pairing.") The bill also survived
two procedural votes-one to indefinitely postpone con-
sideration and another, following the bill's approval, to
reconsider by margins of 55-41 and 53-43 respect-
ively.
The proposed legislation would prohibit discrimina-
tion based on sexual orientation in housing, public.
accommodations, and employment in both public and
private sectors.
Clarenbach had introduced the gay rights bill in two
previous legislative sessions, but this was the first time it
had come to a vote on the Assembly floor. Informed
sources said success this year was due in large part to
"broad-based support from the religious community."
Religious groups and leaders declaring their support of
the bill included the state's United Methodist, Presbyter-
ian, American Baptist, Unitarian Universalist, Lutheran
Church in America, and American Lutheran church
bodies as well as the Episcopal diocese and the Roman
Catholic archdiocese of Milwaukee.
Continued on page 5
---
Wisconsin
assembly
OKs bill
Continued from page 1
Religious leaders saw the bill "as a question
of human rights," said Dan Curd, an assistant
to Clarenbach. By contrast, he said, a
consenting-adults bill to repeal the sodomy
law's criminal prohibition of gay sex, which
failed in the Assembly last spring was, viewed
by some mainstream religionists as a "moral
question," and they consequently withheld
their support. Fundamentalists who had "vir-
tually tied up" legislative telephone lines prior
to the previous vote were "relatively silent" on
this week's gay rights bill, said Curd.
Curd pointed out that legislators voting in
favor of the bill ranged from liberal Democrats
to middle-of-the-road and conservative Demo-
crats as well as Republicans. "That's a real
achievement," he said. "I think the overwhelm-
ing consensus of the legislature was that the
responsible people in the state supported it."
יי
The Assembly heard floor debate for and
against the bill. The Assembly's minority
leader, Rep. John Shabaz (R-West Bend),
warned legislators that they were "going too
far" by protecting a group (gay men and
lesbians) that the original drafters of state
civil rights statutes had not intended to protect.
"This is not a moral issue; this is a matter of
bigotry," countered Clarenbach. "It is a ques-
tion of whether Wisconsin. will tolerate
discrimination."
Despite "rumblings" to exclude school-
teachers from the provisions of the bill, no
amendments were offered on the Assembly
floor. Backers also successfully rebutted oppo-
nents' claims that the bill, if passed, would
mandate affirmative action.
The bill will now be assigned to a Senate
committee, which will hold a public hearing on
the legislation in November or December and
then vote whether to concur with the Assembly
action. If approved by committee, the bill will
likely reach the full Senate during January.
Wisconsin's Republican governor, Lee S.
Dreyfus, then would have the option of signing
the bill into law, not signing it, or vetoing it.
Under either of the first two options, the bill
would become law.
Because of the Senate's previous support of
progressive legislation such as the proposed
sodomy law repeal and endorsement by the
Governor's Advisory Council on Women and
Family Initiatives of the gay rights bill, backers
Iare very optimistic about the bill's future.
Marlene Cummings, gubernatorial adviser
on women and family issues, said in a tele-
phone interview that her council's approval of
the bill had been "nearly unanimous" with only
one dissent based on "lack of information."
She said the council opposed "any form of
discrimination against any member of the
human family."
Clarenbach said he is "confident we have
cleared the major hurdle. . . . Wisconsin will
become the first state in the country to guaran-
tee gay people the legal right to recourse when
they are discriminated against." Such passage.
he said, "should serve to inspire enactment of
similar laws in other states."
Chicago Gay Life Volume 7/Number 20
---
call Prox
202
7245653
AP Wirephoto
Sane Jose, Calif., Mayor Janet Gray Hayes holds a microphone for Rosalynn Carter during
a briefing Tuesday evening.
Rosalynn defends gays, urges
Latin trade policy exceptions
Ro-
SAN FRANCISCO (UPI)
salynn Carter, visiting a bastion of gay
activists, declared Tuesday that ho-
mosexual men and women should be
free of harassment.
During the second day of her west-
ern tour, which will take her to Ho-
nolulu late today, Mrs. Carter first
about her views on
Earlier in the day, Mrs. Carter and
20 other members of the President's
Commission on Mental Health spent
nearly eight hours listening to com-
plaints about treatment of mentally ill
Americans.
She told reporters she felt was
"very important" to develop commu-
nity health care facilities instead of
large government institutions and said
she would use her powers of "persua-
sion" to urge Jimmy Carter to adopt
recommendations by the commission
in his next budget.
tried to skirt reporters' questions Proxmire urges adoption of
anti-gay housing amendment
Then she replied quietly, "I don't think
they should be harassed."
Asked if she would object if her
daughter were taught by a gay teach-
er, she said, "I think Jimmy answered
that question very well. He said he had
enough problems to worry about with-
out having to take on another one."
Later, in an unusual foreign policy
statement by a first lady, Mrs. Carter
said the United States is concerned
about an arms buildup in Latin Amer-
ica and suggested action by the United
Nations or the Organization of Ameri-
can States might be needed to avert a
"possible war."
Mrs. Carter, making her first
speech about her recent seven-nation
Latin American trip, described Ecua-
dor and Peru - both governed by mili-
tary regimes- as a "troubled area."
She said neighboring nations were
building up their armaments although
leaders privately wished they instead
could be developing their industries
and schools.
Mrs. Carter also said it was her per-
sonal opinion that the United States
should change its current exclusion of
Venezuela and Ecuador from tariff
preferences given to developing coun-
tries.
Both nations have been excluded
from the trade benefits because they
are members of the Organization of
Petroleum Exporting Countries, she
noted, even though they did not partic-
ipate in the 1973 oil embargo.
WASHINGTON (UPI). -The stately Senate Appropriations Commit
tee room became a forum on gay rights while members grappled with,
then sidestepped, the issue of equal access to public housing for homosex-
uals.
The dispute arose Tuesday as the appropriations panel debated a bill
providing $67.5 billion to fund the Department of Housing and Urban De-
velopment and other agencies in fiscal 1978. The bill later was passed
without objection.
An amendment, added to the House bill after emotional debate, would
bar the use of any funds to enforce a recent regulation allowing homosex-
uals and other unmarried couples who live together equal access to public
housing.
Sen. William Proxmire (D-Wis.) urged the committee to adopt the
same anti-gay language as the House, but Sen. Lowell Weicker (R-Conn.)
and Chairman Warren Magnuson (D-Wash.) objected, saying the lan-
guage would put Congress on record favoring discrimination against gays
and other unmarried couples.
After spirited debate, the committee altered the language slightly in
order to guarantee a later House-Senate conference committee where the
issue can be fought out.
A Senate floor fight is still possible if an effort is made to strengthen
the restriction.
Proxmire said there is a waiting list for public housing and those with
traditional wife-husband "stable family relationships" should have prefer-
ence.
"We certainly don't want to say that homosexuals have equal access
with families to public housing," he said.
Sen. Lawton Chiles (D-Fla.) whose state was thrust into national lime-
light by singer Anita Bryant's successful campaign to repeal a "gay
rights" ordinance in Dade County, said the amendment does not "deny
any rights" to anyone.
The question, Chiles said, "is as a matter of public policy whether we
should assist them (homosexuals) with subsidized housing.
"
Weicker said the language posed "some very deep constitutional ques-
tions" and added, "I don't want to get caught up in some temporary hys-
teria and start r - people's constitutional rights all over the place."
---